首页> 外文学位 >Determinants of emerging market country risk: Country fundamentals or common factors.
【24h】

Determinants of emerging market country risk: Country fundamentals or common factors.

机译:新兴市场国家风险的决定因素:国家基本面或共同因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper achieves two major objectives. The first objective is to identify the determinants of two emerging market country risk indicators sovereign credit ratings and sovereign bond spreads. The second objective is to measure the degrees of co-movement for recent sovereign credit spreads and thereby investigate changes in emerging bond market investors' attitudes toward country-specific fundamentals. To meet these objectives, this paper considers 14 emerging market countries located in three different regions (East Asia, Latin America, and Transition Europe) for a period between 1995 and 2004. Panel data framework estimations are used to identify sovereign risk determinants. Co-movement degrees of spreads are measured using correlation analysis, concordance analysis, and common factor analysis.By comparing the identified country specific variables in credit ratings and spreads, this paper shows that the models used by credit rating agencies to evaluate country risk are different than the models used by investors. Bond market investors are not solely relying on credit ratings. Political risks were identified as a determinant of sovereign credit ratings. World interest rates, global equity market returns, financial market uncertainty are identified as determinants of sovereign spreads.By measuring co-movement patterns of spreads, this study shows evidence that after the market turmoil period (1994--1999) emerging bond market investors began to pay more attention to country-specific fundamentals and events. This paper's findings contradict the results of Mauro et al. (2002) who compared the co-movement patterns between historical times (1870--1913) and modern times (1994--2000) and concluded that the higher co-movement pattern of modern period is accounted for the two factors: first, co-movement of economic fundamentals of emerging market countries is higher in modern times than in the historical times second, while making investment decisions, the investors of modern times seem to pay less attention to the country-specific events or fundamentals than the investors of historical times. By expanding the sample periods through the year 2004, this paper found that after year 2000, when emerging bond markets went into tranquil period, co-movement degrees of spreads decreased into the levels of historical times as defined by Mauro et al. The results implies that the investors of modern times seem to pay less attention to the country-specific events or fundamentals than the investors of historical times is true only if we consider modern times to be the recent emerging market turmoil period from 1994 to 2000. A robustness test using the updated data of Mauro et al. (2002) also supports the findings of this paper by showing that the co-movement degree of modern updated times (2000--2004) dropped dramatically and is approximately the same as the historical one. In addition, this paper found that investors began to differentiate between emerging market countries based on their fundamentals after 2000. The co-movement degree of investment-grade countries has not changed but that of speculative-grade countries' has decreased dramatically after 2000, when emerging bond market went into tranquil period. This result implies that investors consider countries of sound fundamentals as a unified group and pay little attention to their fundamentals, while at the same time investors pay much more attention to the country-specific events in relatively vulnerable countries.
机译:本文实现了两个主要目标。第一个目标是确定两个新兴市场国家风险指标的决定因素,即主权信用等级和主权债券利差。第二个目标是衡量近期主权信用利差的共同波动程度,从而调查新兴债券市场投资者对特定国家基本面的态度变化。为了实现这些目标,本文考虑了1995年至2004年期间位于三个不同区域(东亚,拉丁美洲和转型欧洲)的14个新兴市场国家。使用面板数据框架估计来确定主权风险决定因素。通过相关分析,一致性分析和公因子分析来衡量利差的共同变动程度。通过比较已识别的特定国家的信用等级和利差变量,本文表明信用评级机构用来评估国家风险的模型是不同的比投资者使用的模型要多。债券市场投资者并不仅仅依赖信用评级。政治风险被确定为主权信用等级的决定因素。世界利率,全球股票市场回报率,金融市场不确定性被确定为主权债券利差的决定因素。通过测量利差的联动模式,这项研究表明证据表明,在市场动荡时期(1994--1999年)之后,新兴债券市场投资者开始更加关注特定国家的基本面和事件。本文的发现与Mauro等人的结果相矛盾。 (2002年)比较了历史时期(1870--1913年)和现代时期(1994--2000年)的联动模式,并得出结论,现代联动模式较高是两个因素:第一,联动-新兴市场国家的经济基本面运动在现代时期比历史上要高,其次,在做出投资决策时,现代投资者似乎对国家特定事件或基本面的关注少于历史上的投资者。 。通过将样本期扩展到2004年,本文发现2000年后新兴债券市场进入平静期,利差的共同移动程度下降到了Mauro等人所定义的历史水平。结果表明,仅当我们将现代视为1994年至2000年的新兴市场动荡时期时,现代投资者似乎才比历史投资者对国家特定事件或基本要素的关注要少。使用Mauro等人的更新数据进行的稳健性测试。 (2002)还通过显示现代更新时间(2000--2004)的协同运动程度急剧下降,并与历史水平相同来支持本文的研究结果。此外,本文发现,投资者在2000年之后开始根据其基本面在新兴市场国家之间进行区分。投资级国家的共同发展程度没有改变,但投机级国家的共同发展程度在2000年之后急剧下降。新兴债券市场进入平静期。这一结果表明,投资者将基本面良好的国家视为一个统一的集团,而很少关注其基本面,而与此同时,投资者则更加关注相对脆弱国家中针对特定国家的事件。

著录项

  • 作者

    Choi, Ji-Young.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Missouri - Columbia.;

  • 授予单位 University of Missouri - Columbia.;
  • 学科 Economics Finance.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 180 p.
  • 总页数 180
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号