首页> 外文学位 >Simplified model of COD and ammonia removal in activated sludge processes.
【24h】

Simplified model of COD and ammonia removal in activated sludge processes.

机译:活性污泥工艺中COD和氨去除的简化模型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Activated sludge (AS) processes are one of the most common methods used to treat municipal wastewater (WW). Mathematical models have been used to predict the complex interactions of AS processes. Because of the complexity of interactions and the diversity of microorganisms involved in WW treatment, an accurate description of the processes can result in extremely complex models. From practical and operational viewpoints, these complex models may not be very useful. For example, wastewater characterization in a manner suitable for use in such complex models is extremely involved and is not done routinely at wastewater treatment plants. This research hypothesizes that superposition of simplified models in wastewater treatment along with generalized wastewater characterization techniques are capable of accurately predicting characteristics of wastewater effluent.; This research evaluates this hypothesis by proposing and evaluating a simplified model based on a combination of the International Association on Water Quality (IAWQ) Activated Sludge Model 1 (ASM 1), simplified WW characterization methods, and a secondary clarifier model to predict the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and ammonia concentrations in wastewater effluent. Activated Sludge Model 1 includes the fundamental processes in a single-sludge system that carries out carbon oxidation, nitrification and denitrification. It involves eight processes incorporating thirteen soluble and particulate components.; Two treatment plants in central Mississippi (Trahon and Savanna) were used to evaluate the model. Trahon treatment plant utilizes an oxidation ditch (OD) process, and Savanna treatment plant utilizes a contact-stabilization (CS) process combined with oxidation lagoons. The lagoons are used to store WW that exceed the treatment capacity of the plant. Some treatment is expected to occur in the lagoons, therefore, the lagoons were considered in the model. The number of reactors used to simulate the conditions in the OD process was considered and adjusted during the calibration. The components that contributed to the suspended solids (SS) concentrations in the clarifier's effluent were calibrated based on the SS historic data.; Monthly averaged data (February 1996 to May 1998), based on daily analysis and records, was collected from the treatment plants. The data was divided into two sets: one set (February 1996 to September 1996) was used to estimate the kinetic and stoichiometric parameters, and the other set (October 1996 to May 1998) was used to evaluate the model. Sensitivity analyses of the parameters revealed that the maximum specific growth rate of autotrophs and decay rate of heterotrophs were the most sensitive parameters in ASM 1. The two characterization methods, fixed fractions and dependent fractions, were based on fractionating the total COD and TKN into biodegradable, non-biodegradable, soluble, and particulate components that can be used in ASM 1. With few exceptions, the model predicted COD and ammonia effluents similar to the reported data in trend. The largest difference between the predicted and reported COD removal efficiency using the fixed fractions wastewater characterization method was 3.53% for the OD and 7.89% for the CS; and the largest difference for ammonia removal, using the fixed fractions method was 11.25% for the OD and 26.58% for the CS. The most likely reason for the differences (exceptions) is inhibitions encountered by the microorganisms responsible for organic matter and ammonia removal which were not accounted for in the model. The fixed fractions method predicted higher concentrations of biodegradable COD, organic nitrogen, and inert soluble COD in the influent than the dependent fractions method. However, the difference did not affect the results significantly. The organic substrate needed for denitrification originates from readily biodegradable substrate in the influent WW, from hydrolysis of slowly biodegradable particulate subst
机译:活性污泥(AS)工艺是用于处理市政废水(WW)的最常用方法之一。数学模型已用于预测AS流程的复杂交互。由于WW处理中相互作用的复杂性和微生物的多样性,对过程的准确描述可能会导致模型极其复杂。从实际和操作的角度来看,这些复杂的模型可能不是很有用。例如,以适合在这种复杂模型中使用的方式对废水进行表征非常困难,并且在废水处理厂通常不会进行。本研究假设废水处理中的简化模型与广义废水表征技术的叠加能够准确预测废水的特征。这项研究通过提出和评估简化模型来评估该假设,该模型基于国际水质协会(IAWQ)活性污泥模型1(ASM 1),简化的WW表征方法和用于预测化学氧气的二级澄清器模型的组合废水中的需求量(COD)和氨浓度。活性污泥模型1包含进行碳氧化,硝化和反硝化的单污泥系统中的基本过程。它涉及八个过程,其中包含十三种可溶性和颗粒性成分。模型在密西西比州中部的两个处理厂(Trahon和Savanna)进行了评估。 Trahon处理厂利用氧化沟(OD)工艺,Savanna处理厂利用接触稳定(CS)工艺与氧化泻湖相结合。泻湖用于存储超过工厂处理能力的污水。预期将在泻湖中进行某些处理,因此,在模型中考虑了泻湖。在校准过程中考虑并调整了用于模拟OD过程条件的反应器数量。根据SS历史数据对影响澄清池废水中悬浮固体(SS)浓度的成分进行了校准。根据每日分析和记录,从处理厂收集每月平均数据(1996年2月至1998年5月)。数据分为两组:一组(1996年2月至1996年9月)用于估计动力学和化学计量参数,另一组(1996年10月至1998年5月)用于评估模型。对参数的敏感性分析表明,自养生物的最大比生长速率和异养生物的衰减速率是ASM 1中最敏感的参数。两种表征方法,固定分数和从属分数,是基于将总COD和TKN分为可生物降解的。 ,可用于ASM 1的不可生物降解的,可溶的和颗粒状组分。除少数例外,该模型预测的COD和氨水排放趋势与报告的数据相似。使用固定馏分废水表征方法预测和报告的COD去除效率之间的最大差异是:OD值为3.53%,CS为7.89%。使用固定馏分法去除氨气的最大差异是OD的11.25%和CS的26.58%。造成差异的最可能原因(例外)是负责有机物和氨去除的微生物所遇到的抑制作用,而这种抑制作用在模型中并未考虑。固定馏分方法预测进水中可生物降解的COD,有机氮和惰性可溶性COD的浓度要高于相关馏分方法。但是,差异不会显着影响结果。反硝化所需的有机底物来自进水WW中易于生物降解的底物,来自缓慢生物降解的颗粒物的水解

著录项

  • 作者

    Yassin, Mohammad.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Mississippi.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Mississippi.;
  • 学科 Engineering Sanitary and Municipal.; Engineering Environmental.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 214 p.
  • 总页数 214
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;环境污染及其防治;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号