首页> 外文学位 >Amplitude-variation-with-offset, prestack waveform, and neural network inversion- A comparative study using real data example from the Rock Springs Uplift, Wyoming.
【24h】

Amplitude-variation-with-offset, prestack waveform, and neural network inversion- A comparative study using real data example from the Rock Springs Uplift, Wyoming.

机译:偏移幅度变化,叠前波形和神经网络反演-使用来自怀俄明州Rock Springs Uplift的真实数据示例进行的比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this work, I use seismic and well data to predict the subsurface geologic model. To accomplish this task, three approaches have been used: (1) amplitude-variation-with-offset inversion, (2) prestack waveform inversion, and (3) neural net inversion. Both amplitude-variation-with-offset and prestack waveform inversion are model-based inversions in which an initial (guess) model is iteratively modified until the synthetic (predicted) data from the model and underlying physics matches observation to reasonable accuracy. While the amplitude-variation-with-offset inversion uses a convolutional model for the underlying physics for computing synthetic data, the prestack waveform inversion uses a rigorous wave equation-based method to compute them. The neural network inversion, on the other hand, is a data-driven inversion methodology in which the network undergoes a series of training to derive linear/nonlinear relationships between the seismic attributes and the model attributes. Once such relations are established, they are used to predict the subsurface model directly from the seismic data. Using all three inversion methods on a single dataset from the Rock-springs uplift, Wyoming, it has been found that both amplitude-variation-with-offset and neural net inversions produce comparable results although the subsurface model estimated by the latter is of slightly higher resolution than the former. Prestack waveform inversion, even though compute-intense, is far superior to the other two inversion methods and should be the method of choice as the parallel computers with large number of compute-nodes become commonly available.
机译:在这项工作中,我使用地震和测井数据来预测地下地质模型。为了完成此任务,已使用了三种方法:(1)带偏移的幅度变化反转,(2)叠前波形反转和(3)神经网络反转。偏移幅度变化和叠前波形反演都是基于模型的反演,其中迭代地修改了初始(猜测)模型,直到来自模型和基础物理的合成(预测)数据将观测值匹配到合理的精度为止。尽管带偏移的幅度变化反演使用卷积模型作为基础物理来计算合成数据,但叠前波形反演使用基于严格波动方程的方法来计算它们。另一方面,神经网络反演是一种数据驱动的反演方法,其中网络经过一系列训练以得出地震属性与模型属性之间的线性/非线性关系。一旦建立了这样的关系,就可以直接从地震数据中预测地下模型。在怀俄明州岩泉隆起的单个数据集上使用所有三种反演方法,已发现振幅偏移随偏移和神经网络反演均产生可比较的结果,尽管后者估计的地下模型略高分辨率要比前者高。即使具有计算强度,叠前波形反演也要比其他两种反演方法优越得多,并且当具有大量计算节点的并行计算机变得普遍可用时,叠前波形反演应成为首选方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Adhikari, Samar.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Wyoming.;

  • 授予单位 University of Wyoming.;
  • 学科 Geophysics.;Geology.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 77 p.
  • 总页数 77
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号