首页> 外文学位 >The Participatory Turn: Participatory Budgeting Comes to America.
【24h】

The Participatory Turn: Participatory Budgeting Comes to America.

机译:参与式转向:参与式预算进入美国。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Participatory Budgeting (PB) has expanded to over 1,500 municipalities worldwide since its inception in Porto Alege, Brazil in 1989 by the leftist Partido dos Trabalhadores (Workers’ Party). While PB has been adopted throughout the world, it has yet to take hold in the United States. This dissertation examines the introduction of PB to the United States with the first project in Chicago in 2009, and proceeds with an in-depth case study of the largest implementation of PB in the United States: Participatory Budgeting in New York City. I assess the outputs of PB in the United States including deliberations, governance, and participation.;I argue that PB produces better outcomes than the status quo budget process in New York City, while also transforming how those who participate understand themselves as citizens, constituents, Council members, civil society leaders and community stakeholders. However, there are serious challenges to participation, including high costs of engagement, process exhaustion, and perils of scalability. I devise a framework for assessment called “citizenly politics,” focusing on: 1) designing participation 2) deliberation 3) participation and 4) potential for institutionalization. I argue that while the material results PB produces are relatively modest, including more innovative projects, PB delivers more substantial non-material or existential results. Existential citizenly rewards include: greater civic knowledge, strengthened relationships with elected officials, and greater community inclusion. Overall, PB provides a viable and informative democratic innovation for strengthening civic engagement within the United States that can be streamlined and adopted to scale.
机译:自1989年由左翼党派(工人党)于巴西的阿尔日港(Porto Alege)创立以来,参与式预算(PB)已扩展到全球1500多个城市。虽然PB已在全球范围内采用,但尚未在美国普及。本文研究了PB在2009年在芝加哥的第一个项目引入美国的情况,并深入研究了美国最大的PB实施:纽约市的参与式预算。我评估了PB在美国的产出,包括审议,治理和参与。;我认为PB产生的结果要比纽约市的现状预算流程更好,同时也改变了参与者对自己作为公民,选民的理解方式,理事会成员,民间社会领袖和社区利益相关者。但是,参与存在严重的挑战,包括参与成本高昂,过程耗竭以及可伸缩性风险。我设计了一个名为“公民政治”的评估框架,重点是:1)设计参与2)审议3)参与和4)制度化的潜力。我认为,尽管PB产生的实质性成果相对较少,包括更具创新性的项目,但PB却提供了更多实质性的非实质性或存在性成果。现有的公民奖励包括:增强公民知识,加强与民选官员的关系以及更大的社区包容性。总体而言,PB可以提供可行和有益的民主创新,以加强美国内部的公民参与,可以简化和扩大规模。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gilman, Hollie Russon.;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University.;

  • 授予单位 Harvard University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 296 p.
  • 总页数 296
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号