首页> 外文学位 >Gender inequality and traditional social norms as predictors of risky sex among men in the north Indian states of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand: Quantitative and qualitative analyses.
【24h】

Gender inequality and traditional social norms as predictors of risky sex among men in the north Indian states of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand: Quantitative and qualitative analyses.

机译:性别不平等和传统的社会规范是北方印度邦和北阿坎德邦男性高风险性行为的预测指标:定量和定性分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Quantitative data from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3) and qualitative data from an NIH-funded study in the north Indian states of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand were used to examine the relationship between men's risky sex (non-marital and unprotected sex) and their gender equality attitudes and expressed social norms. Gender equality dimensions in the quantitative analysis were developed based on men's attitudes towards wife-beating, feelings regarding wives ability to refuse sex, history of family violence, and views on whether women had the right to make household decisions and have financial autonomy. Logistic regression models were fit to explore the influence of gender equality dimensions on reported non-marital sex and condom use. Qualitative analysis explored how men's gender attitudes and expressed social norms were related to their risky sex. Quantitative analysis indicated that men who were more likely to report non-marital sex were those who had a history of family violence [OR=1.83; 95% CI=(1.05-3.17) for married men; OR=1.93; 95% CI=(1.44-2.59) for unmarried men], felt that wife-beating was acceptable [OR=1.93; 95% CI=(1.10-3.38) for married men], and felt that women should not have the right to refuse sex [OR=2.17; 95% CI=(1.05-4.48) for married men]. Men who were more likely to report using condoms during nonmarital sex were those who felt that wife-beating was never acceptable, compared to men who felt that wife-beating was acceptable [OR=2.13; 95% CI=(1.35-3.36)]. Qualitative analysis revealed that men felt that women are sexually insatiable, should have no say over their own sexual needs, and be dependent on men to be sexually gratified. Men also indicated that certain restrictive social norms drove them to more, rather than less, non-marital sex. Men who reported no or inconsistent condom use felt that condoms prevented them from having "real" sex, that women did not have the right to request men to use condoms or to purchase condoms, and that men had the right to force women to have unprotected sex. Interventions that seek to curb the spread of STIs and HIV in India through reducing men's risky sex should promote a redefinition of men's traditional masculinity norms to incorporate acceptance of gender equality and prevention of violence against women.
机译:来自国家家庭健康调查(NFHS-3)的定量数据和美国国立卫生研究院资助的印度北部北方邦和北阿坎德邦邦的研究的定性数据用于检验男性的危险性行为(非婚姻和不受保护的性行为)之间的关系。以及他们的性别平等态度和表达的社会规范。定量分析中的性别平等维度是根据男人对殴打妻子的态度,对妻子拒绝性行为的感受,家庭暴力的历史以及对妇女是否有权做出家庭决定和拥有经济自主权的观点而制定的。逻辑回归模型适合探讨性别平等维度对报告的非婚姻性行为和使用安全套的影响。定性分析探索了男人的性别态度和表达的社会规范与危险性行为之间的关系。定量分析表明,更有可能报告非婚姻性的男人是有家庭暴力史的男人[OR = 1.83;已婚男性95%CI =(1.05-3.17); OR = 1.93; 95%CI =(1.44-2.59)(未婚男性),认为殴打妻子是可以接受的[OR = 1.93; 95%CI =(1.10-3.38)(已婚男性),并且认为女性无权拒绝性行为[OR = 2.17; 95%CI =(1.05-4.48)(已婚男性)。与那些认为殴打是可以接受的男人相比,那些认为在非婚期间使用避孕套的男人更有可能[OR = 2.13; 95%CI =(1.35-3.36)]。定性分析表明,男人认为女人在性方面是无法满足的,不应对自己的性需求有发言权,应依靠男人来满足性要求。男人还指出,某些限制性的社会规范促使他们更多而非更少地非婚。没有报告使用安全套或使用安全套不一致的男人感到安全套阻止了他们进行“真实的”性行为,妇女无权要求男人使用安全套或购买安全套,男人有权强迫妇女保护自己不受保护。性别。旨在通过减少男性危险的性行为来遏制性传播感染和艾滋病毒在印度传播的干预措施,应促使人们重新定义男性的传统男性气概规范,以纳入对性别平等的接受并防止对妇女的暴力行为。

著录项

  • 作者

    Colaco, Rajeev.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Public Health.;Gender Studies.
  • 学位 Dr.P.H.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 88 p.
  • 总页数 88
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号