首页> 外文学位 >Strategies of excess: The postwar assemblages of Alberto Burri, Robert Rauschenberg, and Arman (Italy).
【24h】

Strategies of excess: The postwar assemblages of Alberto Burri, Robert Rauschenberg, and Arman (Italy).

机译:过度策略:战后阿尔贝托·伯里,罗伯特·劳森伯格和阿尔曼(意大利)的集会。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines the postwar assemblage art movement as it developed within international capitalism from 1950 to 1965. Although postwar assemblage was celebrated in museum surveys as early as 1961, scholars have yet to situate this found-object art in relation to its international socio-economic context. An analysis of artworks by Alberto Burri in Rome in the early 1950s, Robert Rauschenberg in New York in the mid-1950s, and Arman (Armand Fernandez) in Paris in the early 1960s reveals the historically specific development of the practice in relation to the postwar economy's international markets and attendant consumer culture. This dissertation proposes that these artists used assemblage strategically to engage with a culture of abundance and excess---its consumer goods, trash, and surplus, as well as its new distribution and mass-marketing systems. Through Allan Kaprow's early thinking about assemblage as an open and changeable form extending into its environment and Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari's later theorization of capitalism as an analogous open form, the introduction argues that assemblage art intervened directly and materially with the flows of capitalist excess. The next chapter looks specifically at the way Burri "sutured" the trash of burlap sacks into modernist grids, both exposing and containing U.S. Marshall Plan food aid packaging in the early 1950s. Continuing with an investigation of Rauschenberg in a burgeoning mass-market culture centered in New York, the dissertation shows how his Combines produced the late fifties spectator as a consumer, "assembled" as an amalgamation of everyday objects. The last chapter argues that Arman's Accumulations (glass vitrines filled with commercial items) performed a systematic sociology by repetitively enacting consumption and its "spectacularization" of the 1960s subject. These three strategies: suturing (Burri), assembling (Rauschenberg), and systematizing (Arman) represent an arc in the development of postwar assemblage art. A burgeoning international consumer economy was first denied by Burri, assembled and articulated by Rauschenberg, and then fully integrated into a system by Arman. This trajectory elaborates how artists and viewers became subjects of capitalist abundance and how assemblages strategically reversed and deferred the mechanisms of postwar capitalism, but always operated within its structure.
机译:本文研究了战后组合艺术运动在1950年至1965年在国际资本主义中的发展。尽管早在1961年的博物馆调查中就庆祝了战后组合艺术,但学者们尚未将这种发现对象艺术与国际社会经济联系起来。上下文。对1950年代初在罗马的Alberto Burri,1950年代中期在纽约的Robert Rauschenberg和1960年代初在巴黎的Arman(Armand Fernandez)的艺术品进行的分析揭示了与战后有关的实践的历史特定发展经济的国际市场和随之而来的消费文化。本文提出,这些艺术家战略性地利用群体来参与一种富裕和过剩的文化,即其消费品,垃圾和剩余文化,以及其新的发行和大众营销体系。通过艾伦·卡普罗(Allan Kaprow)的早期思想,即将组合作为一种开放且可变的形式扩展到其周围环境,以及吉尔斯·德勒兹(Gilles Deleuze)和费利克斯·瓜塔里(Felix Guattari)后来将资本主义理论化为类似的开放形式,引言认为,组合艺术直接和实质性地介入了资本主义过剩的流动。下一章专门讨论Burri将麻布袋的垃圾“缝制”到现代格网中的方式,在1950年代初暴露并盛装美国马歇尔计划食品援助包装。继续对劳森伯格在以纽约为中心的新兴大众市场文化中进行的调查,论文显示了他的联合收割机如何将五十年代末的观众当成消费者,并“组合”为日常物品。上一章认为,《阿曼的蓄积》(装满商业物品的玻璃玻璃小酒杯)通过重复制定1960年代主题的消费及其“引人注目的”表现出了系统的社会学。这三种策略:缝合(Burri),组装(Rauschenberg)和系统化(Arman)代表了战后集合艺术发展的弧线。蓬勃发展的国际消费经济首先被Burri否定,由Rauschenberg组装和阐述,然后由Arman完全整合到系统中。这一轨迹阐明了艺术家和观众如何成为资本主义丰富主义的主题,以及如何在战略上颠覆和推迟战后资本主义的机制,但是始终在其结构内运作。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hamilton, Jaimey.;

  • 作者单位

    Boston University.;

  • 授予单位 Boston University.;
  • 学科 Art History.; American Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 351 p.
  • 总页数 351
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 艺术史、艺术思想史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号