首页> 外文学位 >Arte Povera's theater: Artifice and anti-modernism in Italian art of the 1960s.
【24h】

Arte Povera's theater: Artifice and anti-modernism in Italian art of the 1960s.

机译:Arte Povera的剧院:1960年代意大利艺术中的技巧和反现代主义。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation considers the works of three artists associated with Arte Povera: Michelangelo Pistoletto, Jannis Kounellis and Pino Pascali. It places their work in the context of the cultural and political dialogue that shaped 1960s Italy at large and challenges the critical monopoly on the movement held by Germano Celant, the critic who coined the term Arte Povera in 1967, and who continues to dominate scholarly interpretations of the group today. Disputing Celant's definition of Arte Povera as an art of poor materials, and exposing the contradictions inherent in his effort to align the group with wider international (and specifically modernist trends), this dissertation examines the Italian artists' pointed critique of standard modernist paradigms. Against the tradition within which Celant found a place for the Arte Povera artists, these three artists developed a position specific to their country's situation as a postfascist, newly consumerized culture. For them, such typically taboo concepts as art's fictional status and its memorial and narrative impulse were essential to maintaining a dialogue between subject and object in the face of what Italian postwar intellectuals perceived to be the sustained predominance of absolutist modes of thought. This dissertation will examine these artists' effort to confront autonomy, material immediacy and the quest for objectively verifiable truths with an acceptance of artifice, openness and insufficiency that is less nostalgic than corrective of all determinate positions both past and present.; After a detailed introduction, which examines Celant's writings, the discussion begins with the role of vision and theatricality in Pistoletto's mirror paintings and performative work. The second chapter investigates Kounellis' turn to outmoded artistic forms as a specific alternative to modernism's prohibition on narrative communication and historical memory. The third and final chapter analyzes Pascali's mobilization of artifice and disguise in response to the growing consumer hegemony. The dissertation concludes by considering these three artists in relationship to Arte Povera as a whole.
机译:本文考虑了三位与Arte Povera相关的艺术家的作品:米开朗基罗·皮斯托莱托(Michelangelo Pistoletto),詹尼斯·库内利斯(Jannis Kounellis)和皮诺·帕斯卡利(Pino Pascali)。它把他们的工作置于文化和政治对话的背景下,这种对话塑造了整个1960年代的意大利,并挑战了日耳曼诺·塞兰特(Germano Celant)所持运动的批判性垄断地位,该批评家在1967年创造了Arte Povera一词,并继续主导学术解释今天的小组。本文驳斥了塞兰特(Celant)对贫穷艺术的定义,认为这是一种贫乏的艺术,并揭示了他努力使该群体与更广泛的国际(特别是现代主义趋势)保持一致的内在矛盾,本文研究了意大利艺术家对标准现代主义范式的尖锐批评。在Celant为Arte Povera艺术家找到住所的传统中,这三位艺术家根据其国家作为法西斯主义,新消费化文化的状况发展了自己的立场。对于他们来说,面对意大利战后知识分子认为绝对主义思想模式持续占主导地位的情况,诸如艺术的虚构身份及其纪念性和叙事冲动之类的典型禁忌概念对于维持主体与客体之间的对话至关重要。本论文将考察这些艺术家在面对自治,物质直接性和寻求客观可验证的真理方面所做的努力,并接受对技巧,开放性和不足的接受,这种技巧的怀旧程度不及纠正过去和现在所有确定的立场。在详细介绍了Celant的著作之后,讨论首先从视觉和戏剧性在Pistoletto的镜子绘画和表演作品中的作用开始。第二章研究了库奈里斯转向过时的艺术形式,作为现代主义禁止叙事交流和历史记忆的一种特定选择。第三章也是最后一章分析了Pascali为应对日益增长的消费者霸权而动员的技巧和伪装。本文的结论是考虑这三位艺术家与Arte Povera的整体关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gilman, Claire Swan.;

  • 作者单位

    Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Columbia University.;
  • 学科 Art History.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 415 p.
  • 总页数 415
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 艺术史、艺术思想史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号