首页> 外文学位 >Boundary breaking and compliance: Will-Erich Peuckert and 20th century German Volkskunde.
【24h】

Boundary breaking and compliance: Will-Erich Peuckert and 20th century German Volkskunde.

机译:突破界限和遵守法规:威尔·埃里克·皮克特(Will-Erich Peuckert)和20世纪的德国人福克斯库德(Volkskunde)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

What is an individual's role in shaping disciplinary history? How does a scholar produce knowledge, caught between personal interest, academic customs, media attention, and societal pressures? And what are the repercussions of conducting scholarship during a time of political unrest? Archival research grounds this dissertation which resides at the interface between folkloristics and Volkskunde and disciplinary history. It examines these questions by thoroughly analyzing the case-study of Will-Erich Peuckert (1895-1969), the partially marginalized German Volkskundler often credited with saving the discipline of Volkskunde in Germany after World War II. Peuckert, a controversial figure, has faded out of recent interest in disciplinary historiography, in part because his research interests in the occult and in belief studies are now considered to be stagnant and taboo. Yet his contributions are nevertheless a fascinating insight into a discipline grappling with an ideological burden which came to a head during World War II, but which has foundations that go back much further. While Peuckert is known for his in-depth scholarship on folk narratives, his major contributions include writing a book which expanded the concept of folk, actively resisting the Nazis during World War II, attempting to internationalize the discipline, and experimenting with witchcraft. These research areas were often in tension with a more stagnant discipline which, after World War II, was more focused on static analyses using collected data from the past. This dissertation, underscoring the dialectic between new research and a healing discipline, discusses the way in which Peuckert at one and the same time conformed to a set of disciplinary frameworks and rules, while at the same time breaking boundaries and making new advances for the field. The way in which one individual interacted with and ultimately shaped a discipline in crisis during a time of crisis is ultimately at stake.
机译:个人在塑造学科历史方面起什么作用?学者如何产生介于个人兴趣,学术风俗,媒体关注和社会压力之间的知识?在政治动荡时期进行学术活动会有什么影响?档案研究的基础是民俗学与Volkskunde与学科历史之间的联系。它通过彻底分析Will-Erich Peuckert(1895-1969)的案例研究来研究这些问题,Will-Erich Peuckert是部分边缘化的德国人,在第二次世界大战后经常被认为是在德国挽救了Volkskunde的纪律的。有争议的人物佩克特(Peuckert)逐渐摆脱了对学科史学的兴趣,部分原因是他对隐秘和信仰研究的研究兴趣现在被认为是停滞和禁忌。然而,他的贡献却使人深刻地领会到一门应对意识形态负担的学科,该学科在第二次世界大战期间就已浮出水面,但其基础可以追溯到更远的年代。尽管Peuckert以其对民间叙事的深入研究而闻名,但他的主要贡献包括撰写了一本书,扩展了民间观念,在第二次世界大战期间积极抵抗纳粹,试图使这一学科国际化,并尝试了巫术。这些研究领域通常处于停滞状态,这在第二次世界大战之后更趋于停滞,而后者则更侧重于使用过去收集的数据进行静态分析。本文着重强调了新研究与康复学科之间的辩证法,探讨了皮克特同时符合一套学科框架和规则的方式,同时突破了界限并为该领域取得了新进展。 。在危机时期,个人与危机互动并最终形成纪律的方式最终受到威胁。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jacobsen, Johanna Micaela.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pennsylvania.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pennsylvania.;
  • 学科 Biography.;Economics History.;Folklore.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 339 p.
  • 总页数 339
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:40:30

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号