首页> 外文学位 >Conscious-authentic leadership in the workplace: Its impact on employee behavior and specific organizational outcomes.
【24h】

Conscious-authentic leadership in the workplace: Its impact on employee behavior and specific organizational outcomes.

机译:工作场所具有真实意识的领导力:它对员工行为和特定组织成果的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This is a comparative study of two groups of companies. Group I companies are led by CEOs who use a conscious-authentic leadership approach. Group II companies are led by CEOs who do not use a conscious-authentic leadership approach. Each group is pre-categorized by legitimate and unrelated third parties in the business community and academe. The contention is that Group I CEOs, perceived by their employees as conscious-authentic leaders, purposefully infuse their conscious-authentic leadership behavior, personal values and belief system within the daily business practices, policies and employee programs of their respective organizations. As hypothesized, the result of this approach yields enhanced positive organizational behavior (POB) generated by the employees of Group I companies which favorably impacts specific organizational outcomes. By comparison, Group II companies do not yield these results.;The specific organizational outcomes tested for this study are voluntary employee turnover and absenteeism. These outcomes are tested over the period 2003-2005, inclusive. Both quantitative and qualitative methodologies are used in this study. An Employee Questionnaire and a Leadership Questionnaire are used as data gathering instruments. Each CEO of Group I and Group II companies is interviewed and the responses are used for comparison purposes and to construct a proposed working model of conscious-authentic leadership components used by Group I CEOs. Group I CEOs purposefully implement and infuse these components throughout their respective organization. The result of this study indicates greater positive affects on employee organizational behavior and a higher measured record for specific organizational outcomes for Group I companies during this test period.
机译:这是对两组公司的比较研究。第一类公司由使用有意识的,真实的领导方法的首席执行官领导。第二类公司由不使用有意识的,真实的领导方法的首席执行官领导。每个组由商业社区和学术机构中合法且无关的第三方预先分类。争论的焦点是,第一类CEO被其员工视为有意识的,真实的领导者,在各自组织的日常业务实践,政策和员工计划中有目的地灌输其有意识的,真实的领导行为,个人价值观和信念体系。如假设的那样,此方法的结果可增强由第一集团公司员工产生的积极的组织行为(POB),从而对特定的组织成果产生有利的影响。相比之下,第二集团公司没有得出这些结果。本研究测试的特定组织结果是自愿员工离职和旷工。在2003年至2005年期间(包括当年)测试了这些结果。本研究使用定量和定性方法。员工问卷和领导力问卷被用作数据收集工具。对第一集团和第二集团公司的每位首席执行官进行访谈,并将答复用于比较目的,并为第一集团的首席执行官所使用的具有真实感的领导力成分拟议的工作模型。第一组首席执行官有目的地在其各自的组织中实施和注入这些组件。这项研究的结果表明,在此测试期间,第一类公司对员工组织行为的积极影响更大,对特定组织成果的衡量记录也更高。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hofman, Robert E., Jr.;

  • 作者单位

    The Claremont Graduate University.;

  • 授予单位 The Claremont Graduate University.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 178 p.
  • 总页数 178
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号