首页> 外文学位 >Efficacy of attractant legume crops to reduce soybean damage by deer.
【24h】

Efficacy of attractant legume crops to reduce soybean damage by deer.

机译:豆科植物引诱剂减少鹿对大豆的危害。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The need to develop non-lethal, successful, and realistic methods to manage crop damage caused by white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) has increased with the prevalence of locally abundant deer populations and societal demands for non-lethal wildlife management. Tests were conducted to find if placing legume border crops at the edge of a soybean field would reduce deer damage to soybeans. Two border crop varieties, Deer Treat and Game Mix (L1) and Deer Plot Legume Mixture (L2) were tested with free ranging deer at the SIUC farms in Illinois. Data collection included track counts, soybean browse counts, legume browse counts, and yield. The objectives were to compare deer attraction to legume border crops adjacent to a soybean field with track counts and browse damage and compare browse damage and yield of soybeans planted adjacent to the border crops. Track counts showed a difference among the treatments (F2,81 = 4.73, P = 0.0114). The L2 (x¯ = 202, n = 30) and L1 (x¯ = 196, n = 30) treatments had approximately 24% higher track counts that the control (x¯ = 160, n = 30). Based on nip counts, there was no evidence that deer preferred L1 (x¯ = 116, n = 15) over L2 (x¯ = 100, n = 15) over the other (F1,8 = 2.73, P = 0.1116). Early season soybean nip counts were 147% higher for the L2 ( x¯ = 37, n = 9) treatment than the L1 ( x¯ = 15, n = 9) treatment at 9.1 m from the border crop treatments (F1,4 = 24.31, P = 0.0003). Comparing soybean yields there was a difference between treatments (F2,4 = 78.97, P = 0.0007) with L2 (x¯ = 3,658 kg/ha, n = 3) and Control (x¯ = 3,292 kg/ha, n = 3) having at least a 40% higher yield than L1 (x¯ = 2,347 kg/ha, n = 3).
机译:随着当地丰富的鹿种群的普及以及社会对非致死野生动物管理的需求,对开发非致死,成功和现实的方法来管理由白尾鹿(Odocoileus virginianus)造成的农作物损害的需求日益增加。进行了测试,以确定将豆科植物的边际作物放在大豆田的边缘是否会减少鹿对大豆的损害。在伊利诺伊州的SIUC农场,使用自由放养的鹿对两个边境作物品种,Deer Treat和Game Mix(L1)和Deer Plot豆科植物混合物(L2)进行了测试。数据收集包括跟踪计数,大豆浏览计数,豆类浏览计数和产量。目的是通过田径计数和浏览损害比较鹿对邻近大豆田的豆类边境作物的吸引力,并比较邻近边境作物种植的大豆的浏览损害和产量。跟踪计数显示治疗之间的差异(F2,81 = 4.73,P = 0.0114)。 L2(x¯= 202,n = 30)和L1(x¯= 196,n = 30)处理的轨迹数比对照(x¯= 160,n = 30)高约24%。根据辊隙数,没有证据表明鹿比其他动物(F1,8 = 2.73,P = 0.1116)更喜欢L1(x = 116,n = 15)而不是L2(x = 100,n = 15)。 L2(x = 37,n = 9)处理的早季大豆压区计数比边际作物处理高9.1 m(F1,4 = 24.31,P = 0.0003)。比较大豆产量,L2(x = 3,658 kg / ha,n = 3)和对照(x¯= 3,292 kg / ha,n = 3)处理(F2,4 = 78.97,P = 0.0007)之间存在差异。产量至少比L1高40%(x = 2,347 kg / ha,n = 3)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mortimer, Joseph R.;

  • 作者单位

    Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.$bPlant and Soil Science.;

  • 授予单位 Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.$bPlant and Soil Science.;
  • 学科 Agriculture Agronomy.; Agriculture Forestry and Wildlife.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 41 p.
  • 总页数 41
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 农学(农艺学) ; 森林生物学 ;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号