首页> 外文学位 >Difference in drumming speed of various skill levels dependent upon warm-up protocols.
【24h】

Difference in drumming speed of various skill levels dependent upon warm-up protocols.

机译:各种技巧水平的击鼓速度差异取决于热身协议。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Context. There is a lack of information on warm-ups and their effects on performance and injury prevention. If this is combined with the contradictory evidence found in studies, a problem presents itself.;Objective. The purpose of this study is to examine the difference in maximal drumming speed of various skill levels dependent upon warm-up protocols.;Design. A within subjects, quasi-experimental design.;Setting. Controlled laboratory setting.;Participants. 15 volunteering California University of Pennsylvania students who play drums and have no upper extremity injuries or are taking any medications that would affect their ability to strike the Drumometer Model II.;Interventions. Subjects were tested on 4 different days. The first day was a baseline test. The test included hitting the Drumometer Model II as fast as they could for 60 seconds. 3 attempts were given with a 3 minute rest in between. The second day began with a warmup protocol; heat, stretching or rudiments and then the same testing was completed with the Drumometer Model II. On the third day, another warm-up protocol was performed and then the same drum testing. On the fourth day, the last remaining warm-up protocol was performed and then the subject was tested with the Drumometer Model II.;Main Outcome Measures. Number of strikes on the Drumometer Model II during a 60 second period of time.;Results. The results showed that there was no significant difference between the warm-up protocols on maximal drumming speed. There was also no significant difference between the warm-up protocols on various skill levels.;Conclusion. Drummers who are looking only to improve their speed should chose a warm-up of their choice since neither heat, stretching and rudiments was shown to be significant.
机译:上下文。缺少有关热身及其对性能和伤害预防的影响的信息。如果将其与研究中发现的矛盾证据相结合,就会出现问题。这项研究的目的是检查取决于预热协议的各种技能水平的最大击鼓速度的差异。主题内的准实验设计。受控的实验室环境。 15名自愿参加加利福尼亚大学(University of Pennsylvania)的学生,他们打鼓且没有上肢受伤或正在服用任何会影响其击打Drumometer Model II的能力的药物。在4天不同的时间对受试者进行测试。第一天是基线测试。测试包括以最快的速度击打II型Drumometer 60秒。进行了3次尝试,中间休息了3分钟。第二天从热身协议开始;加热,拉伸或打磨,然后使用Drumometer Model II完成相同的测试。第三天,执行了另一个预热程序,然后进行了相同的鼓测试。在第四天,执行最后剩余的预热方案,然后用II型鼓膜仪对受试者进行测试;主要结果指标。 60秒内Drumometer Model II的打击次数。结果表明,在最大鼓速度上的预热方案之间没有显着差异。不同技能水平的热身方案之间也没有显着差异。鼓手只想提高自己的速度,应该选择自己喜欢的热身器,因为热,拉伸和粗暴都没有表现出来。

著录项

  • 作者

    Holland, Micah Joseph.;

  • 作者单位

    California University of Pennsylvania.;

  • 授予单位 California University of Pennsylvania.;
  • 学科 Education Performing Arts.;Health Sciences General.;Performing Arts.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 103 p.
  • 总页数 103
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号