首页> 外文学位 >Trade liberalization in Bangladesh: An international political economy perspective.
【24h】

Trade liberalization in Bangladesh: An international political economy perspective.

机译:孟加拉国的贸易自由化:国际政治经济学的视角。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Utilizing International Political Economy (IPE) perspectives, I analyze trade reform policies in Bangladesh under the research query: What were the major forces for trade liberalization in Bangladesh? In particular, what were the relative importance of donors, the government and domestic pressure groups? I examine these questions at the aggregate and sectoral level.; Extending Robert Putman's two-level bargaining game, I classify the IPE models as follows: Autonomous Government driven by international organizations (AGIO); Autonomous Government following Statist policies (AGS); Bureaucratic Politics (BP); Domestic Politics influenced by interest groups (DPIG); and Domestic Politics influenced by the general public (DPGP). Modifying previous classifications of the trade reform period by various authors (mostly World Bank), I distinguish four phases of trade liberalization: Phase 1 (1971-1982); Phase 2 (1982-1991); Phase 3 (1992-1996) and Phase 4 (1997-present). I qualitatively examine the nature of the trade liberalization during these phases with respect to my IPE models.; Examining my research query in terms of contingent generalizations, I found that no one particular model dominated all of the different phases. It did appear that the AGS model seemed relatively more prevalent in Phase 1 and for most of Phase 2, given that the donors were mostly less significant (less role of AGIO) and that the autocratic government had overwhelmed interest groups and bureaucratic politics, under military pressure and realism. The end of Phase 2 and most of Phase 3 appeared to provide relatively more credibility to the AGIO model, given that democracy had surfaced explicitly and donors were driving most of the momentum of reform. Phase 4 was more a relative combination of BP and DPIG, with some reasserting of the AGS model, though under a democratic guise.; Presenting a case study on the Livestock and Poultry sector, I apply Coplin and Leary's (1983) "Prince Model," focusing on the 1994 ban on eggs. I found that the DPIG model had primarily driven the eventual ban with secondary support from the BP and the AGS models. This indicates the need for further sectoral studies to understand the full nature of the trade liberalization process in Bangladesh.
机译:利用国际政治经济学(IPE)的观点,我根据以下研究查询分析了孟加拉国的贸易改革政策:孟加拉国贸易自由化的主要力量是什么?特别是,捐助者,政府和国内压力团体的相对重要性是什么?我将在总体和部门层面研究这些问题。在扩展罗伯特·普特曼(Robert Putman)的两层讨价还价游戏的过程中,我将IPE模型分类如下:由国际组织(AGIO)驱动的自治政府;遵循政府政策的自治政府(AGS);官僚政治(BP);受利益集团影响的国内政治(DPIG);以及受大众影响的国内政治(DPGP)。由不同的作者(主要是世界银行)修改了贸易改革时期的先前分类,我区分了贸易自由化的四个阶段:第一阶段(1971-1982年);第二阶段。第二阶段(1982-1991);第三阶段(1992-1996年)和第四阶段(1997年至今)。在我的IPE模型中,我定性地研究了在这些阶段中贸易自由化的性质。从偶然性概括的角度审视我的研究查询,我发现没有一个特定的模型可以控制所有不同阶段。似乎确实,AGS模型在第1阶段和第2阶段的大部分时间内似乎相对普遍,这是因为捐助者大多没有那么重要(AGIO的作用较小),并且在军方统治下,专制政府压倒了利益集团和官僚政治。压力和现实主义。鉴于民主已明确浮出水面且捐助者正在推动改革的大部分势头,第二阶段的结束和第三阶段的大部分似乎为AGIO模式提供了相对较高的可信度。第四阶段更像是BP和DPIG的相对组合,尽管以民主为幌子,但对AGS模型却有所主张。在介绍有关畜禽业的案例研究时,我应用了Coplin和Leary(1983)的“王子模型”,重点是1994年对鸡蛋的禁令。我发现DPIG模型在BP和AGS模型的辅助支持下最终推动了最终的禁令。这表明需要进行进一步的部门研究,以了解孟加拉国贸易自由化进程的全部性质。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ali, Shafin Hasan.;

  • 作者单位

    The Claremont Graduate University.;

  • 授予单位 The Claremont Graduate University.;
  • 学科 Economics General.; Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 354 p.
  • 总页数 354
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 经济学;政治理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号