首页> 外文学位 >Jean Toomer and Waldo Frank: Literary Modernism and the ambivalence of Black -Jewish identification.
【24h】

Jean Toomer and Waldo Frank: Literary Modernism and the ambivalence of Black -Jewish identification.

机译:吉恩·汤默(Jean Toomer)和沃尔多·弗兰克(Waldo Frank):文学现代主义与黑人犹太认同的矛盾。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this dissertation, Michael Yellin examines the relationship between Jean Toomer, a multi-racial writer associated with the Harlem Renaissance, and Waldo Frank, a Jewish-American writer and early proponent of Modernism. Through close textual analysis of their correspondence and published and unpublished writing, he studies the influence they had on each other's literary and intellectual work in the early 1920s. He contends that while Toomer was attracted to Frank's call for rebellion against white Christian dominance in Our America, Toomer's identification with Frank was always marked by ambivalence. According to Yellin, such ambivalence led to estrangement between Toomer and Frank for two reasons: (1) Frank's fixation on the redemptive value of suffering (particularly Jewish suffering) repulsed Toomer, who was deeply concerned with his own lack of power, and (2) Frank failed to grasp the importance Toomer placed on his multi-racial identity. Placing Toomer's Cane in the context of his engagement with Frank brings the text's commentary on race into fuller relief. Yellin asserts that Cane rejects the Judeo-Christian notion of a "chosen" race and replaces it with a eugenic theory of human evolution through interracial procreation. He also juxtaposes Frank's Holiday, Memoirs, published essays, and correspondence with Toomer to add insight into Jewish Americans' conceptualization of race. As a whole, this dissertation is a contribution to the study of relations between African Americans and Jewish Americans.
机译:在这篇论文中,迈克尔·耶林(Michael Yellin)研究了与哈林复兴运动相关的多种族作家让·托默(Jean Toomer)与犹太裔美国作家和现代主义的早期支持者沃尔多·弗兰克(Waldo Frank)之间的关系。通过对他们的书信以及已发表和未发表的作品进行仔细的文本分析,他研究了他们对彼此在1920年代初的文学和智力著作中的影响。他认为,虽然图默尔被弗兰克呼吁反抗白人基督徒在美国的统治地位,但托默尔对弗兰克的认同始终带有矛盾性。根据耶林(Yellin)的说法,这种矛盾导致托默尔(Toomer)和弗兰克(Frank)之间疏远,其原因有两个:(1)弗兰克(Frank)对苦难(特别是犹太人苦难)的救赎价值的关注驱使了托默尔,他深切关注自己的力量不足,并且(2 )弗兰克(Frank)无法把握托默(Toomer)对其多种族身份的重视。将Toomer的甘蔗放在与Frank的交往中,使文字对种族的评论更加充分。 Yellin断言Cane拒绝犹太人和基督教的“选择的”种族的观念,而用人类通过种族繁殖的优生论来代替它。他还把弗兰克的假日,回忆录,发表的文章以及与图默的往来并列,以增加对犹太美国人种族概念的了解。总体而言,本文是对非裔美国人与犹太裔美国人之间关系研究的贡献。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yellin, Michael Joseph.;

  • 作者单位

    Lehigh University.;

  • 授予单位 Lehigh University.;
  • 学科 American literature.;Judaic studies.;Black studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 219 p.
  • 总页数 219
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号