首页> 外文学位 >Ridotta alla perfettione: Metaphysics and history in the music -theoretical writings of Giovanni Maria Artusi.
【24h】

Ridotta alla perfettione: Metaphysics and history in the music -theoretical writings of Giovanni Maria Artusi.

机译:精简至完美:音乐的形而上学和历史-乔凡尼·玛丽亚·阿图西的理论著作。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation explores the metaphysical, epistemological, and historical strands in the musical thought of Giovanni Maria Artusi, notorious for his polemic with Monteverdi. Although he figures prominently in the history of music as an archconservative critic, the music-theoretical and philosophical underpinnings of his actual writings remain little studied and poorly understood. While not attempting to overturn our basic understanding of the Artusi-Monteverdi controversy, the dissertation strives to deepen that understanding by exploring the intellectual and cultural foundations of Artusi's arguments. Engaging with the frustratingly complex amalgamation of intellectual and musical influences, Artusi and Monteverdi emerge as men largely concerned with the same question: what is the position of modern music vis-a-vis its own history?;The seven chapters investigate Artusi's attempts to map his individual experiences of music onto the structure of human knowledge established through the Renaissance intellectual recourse to Aristotelian science. Artusi adopts and adjusts certain Aristotelian doctrines to make space within a largely Aristotelian structure of human knowledge for a Renaissance conception of musical understanding. It is not that Artusi represents a purely conservative stance. Indeed his ideological acts of comprehension are remarkably flexible, allowing him to make deeper "sense" out of surface aberrance. Thus when an understanding of a musical passage cannot be negotiated within Artusi's remarkably liberal system, it becomes necessary for Artusi to view it as a pernicious misstep capable of overturning not simply one theorist's system but the very conditions of the possibility of knowledge itself. However, Artusi's liberalized theory of dissonance treatment and his incipient theory of musical levels in many ways justifies seconda prattica techniques (perhaps despite his intentions). Indeed, one of the goals of this dissertation will be to demonstrate that Artusi, by pushing the Zarlinian system to its limits, opened the way not to its collapse but to its transformation.;Early chapters examine the manner in which Artusi believed that music as science intersected with musical practice. The ensuing chapters examine Artusi's understanding of music history, his liberal views on dissonance, his incipient theory of levels, and his belief in the moral imperative of modal unity.
机译:本文探讨了乔凡尼·玛丽亚·阿图西(Giovanni Maria Artusi)的音乐思想中的形而上学,认识论和历史背景,他因与蒙特维第(Monteverdi)的争论而声名狼藉。尽管他在音乐史上是一位保守主义者,在音乐史上占有举足轻重的地位,但他的实际著作的音乐理论和哲学基础仍然很少研究和理解。在不试图推翻我们对Artusi-Monteverdi争议的基本理解的同时,本文试图通过探索Artusi论点的知识和文化基础来加深这种理解。面对令人沮丧的知识和音乐影响的复杂融合,阿尔图西和蒙泰维第出现时人们主要关注以下问题:现代音乐相对于其自身历史的立场是什么?;这七个章节探讨了阿尔图西试图绘制地图的尝试他的个人音乐经历通过文艺复兴时期对亚里士多德科学的智力求助建立了人类知识的结构。 Artusi采纳并调整了某些亚里士多德主义,以在很大程度上是亚里士多德的人类知识结构中腾出空间,以实现文艺复兴时期音乐理解的概念。 Artusi并非纯粹代表保守立场。确实,他的意识形态行动非常灵活,使他能够从表面异常中做出更深刻的“感官”。因此,当在阿图西的显着自由主义体系中无法协商音乐的理解时,阿图斯有必要将其视为一种有害的失误,不仅能够推翻一个理论家的体系,而且能够推翻知识本身的可能性。然而,阿尔图斯的不和谐治疗理论的自由化和他对音乐水平的早期理论在许多方面证明了二次曲调技术的合理性(尽管有他的意图)。的确,本论文的目标之一是证明阿尔图西通过将扎林主义体系推向极限,而不是使其瓦解而是为它的转型打开了道路;早期各章考察了阿尔图西认为音乐作为一种方式的方式。科学与音乐实践相交。随后的章节考察了阿图斯对音乐历史的理解,他对不和谐的自由主义观点,他的早期水平理论以及他对模式统一的道德要求的信念。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jenkins, Chadwick.;

  • 作者单位

    Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Columbia University.;
  • 学科 Music.;Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 450 p.
  • 总页数 450
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号