首页> 外文学位 >Subsurface transformations of depleted uranium at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.
【24h】

Subsurface transformations of depleted uranium at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland.

机译:马里兰州阿伯丁试验场的贫铀地下转化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Approximately 130,000 kg of depleted uranium (DU) from ammunition testing have been deposited in soils since 1974 and remain in the environment at Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG), MD. Removal of the DU and DU contaminated soils is complicated by the presence of dense vegetation and unexploded ordnance (UXO). Excavation of contaminated soils would require denuding parts of APG, thereby damaging the wildlife habitat and increasing erosion, which could possibly degrade water quality in streams at APG and in the Chesapeake Bay. Personnel exposure to UXO during the remediation activities would also pose an immediate threat of injury. Environmental radiation monitoring (ERM) data showed limited transport of DU within the impact area and no transport to the Bay. Previous studies of the environmental behavior of DU munitions at APG indicated that sorption reactions and biological processes attenuate DU transport. The present work investigated chemical, physical, and biological processes influencing DU transport at APG by examining the following: (1) the effects of rainfall and the water table on the presence of DU in ground and surface waters, (2) the ability of indigenous bacteria to reduce U(VI) and precipitate U(IV) from solution, and (3) the atmospheric and aqueous oxidation rates under oxidizing and reduced conditions.; ERM data of ground and surface water, soils, and surface water sediments collected from 1992 to 2004 were examined to determine if DU had been mobilized and transported to natural waters. Infiltration to groundwater was not found; however, large counting uncertainties made it difficult to identify the source of U as concentrations were near background. Additional ground and surface water samples were collected and analyzed using extended counting periods, which provided the detection capability needed to identify the source of U measured in water samples. The presence of DU correlated with rainfall and high water tables, which suggests that the DU measured in samples resulted from leaching and/or surface runoff of DU in the saturated zone rather than from infiltration.; Laboratory batch experiments were performed with ground and surface water and surface water sediments to determine if indigenous bacteria are capable of reducing U(VI). Reduction in ground and surface water samples was observed only in samples with nitrogen and phosphate amendments and that did not contain high concentrations of nitrate ( 1 mg/L). In contrast, indigenous bacteria in surface water sediments reduced uranium with or without nutrient amendments.; Field and column studies provided an effective means of evaluating the oxidation, mobilization, and transport of DU in APG soils. Transfer of DU oxidation products from DU fragments placed on the soil surface was limited to soils from 0 to 10 cm below the fragments. Subsurface fragments were oxidized uniformly on all surfaces; however, the amount lost to oxidation varied under different soil conditions. Subsurface fragments in the vadose zone lost up to 5.0 wt.% to oxidation in one-year, whereas fragments in wetlands lost only 0.6 wt.% to oxidation products in the one to two years of exposure.; Column studies showed strong retention of U(VI) under all conditions tested; essentially all of the U in the column feed was retained in the columns over the period of the experiments, except for sandy loam soils, which had effluent concentrations measuring 3 to 4% of influent values. Most of the U mass was retained in the first 1.0-cm depth in soils. U retention included both U(IV) precipitation and binding of U(VI) to soil constituents, such as organic matter and clay. Most of the U(VI) was sorbed reversibly, such that it was readily extracted from the soils by aqueous solutions containing carbonate buffer. The addition of acetate slightly enhanced the bioreduction of U(VI) to U(IV). The presence of U (3 to 4% of the influent concentration) in the effluent of the sandy loam soils indicates that U co
机译:自1974年以来,约有130,000千克弹药消耗的贫铀(DU)沉积在土壤中,并留在马里兰州阿伯丁试验场(APG)的环境中。密集的植被和未爆弹药(UXO)的存在使DU和DU污染土壤的清除变得复杂。开挖受污染的土壤将需要剥夺APG的一部分,从而破坏野生生物的栖息地并增加侵蚀,这可能会降低APG和切塞皮克湾的溪流水质。在整治过程中,人员接触未爆炸物也会立即造成伤害威胁。环境辐射监测(ERM)数据显示,在受影响区域内DU的运输有限,并且没有向海湾的运输。先前在APG上对DU弹药的环境行为进行的研究表明,吸附反应和生物过程会减弱DU的运输。本工作通过检查以下方面,调查了影响APG的DU迁移的化学,物理和生物过程:(1)降雨和地下水位对地下水和地表水中DU的影响,(2)土著居民的能力细菌还原U(VI)并从溶液中沉淀U(IV),以及(3)在氧化和还原条件下的大气和水相氧化速率。对1992年至2004年收集的地下水和地表水,土壤以及地表水沉积物的ERM数据进行了检查,以确定DU是否已被调集并运输到自然水中。未发现渗入地下水;然而,由于浓度接近背景,大量的不确定性使得难以确定U的来源。收集了更多的地下水和地表水样品,并使用延长的计数周期进行了分析,这提供了确定水样品中U来源的检测能力。 DU的存在与降雨和高水位有关,这表明样品中测得的DU是由于DU在饱和区中的浸出和/或表面径流而不是由于入渗引起的。对地下水和地表水以及地表水的沉积物进行了实验室分批实验,以确定原生细菌是否能够还原U(VI)。仅在添加了氮和磷酸盐的样本中且不含高浓度硝酸盐(<1 mg / L)的样本中,地下水和地表水的样本减少。相反,在有或没有营养改良剂的情况下,地表水沉积物中的土著细菌都会还原铀。田间和田间研究为评估APG土壤中DU的氧化,迁移和运输提供了有效的手段。 DU氧化产物从放置在土壤表面的DU碎片的转移仅限于碎片下方0至10 cm的土壤。次表面碎片在所有表面上均一氧化;然而,氧化损失的量在不同的土壤条件下会有所不同。渗流区的地下碎片在一年内氧化损失高达5.0 wt。%,而湿地的碎片在暴露一到两年内氧化产物损失仅0.6 wt。%。色谱柱研究表明,在所有测试条件下,U(VI)的保留力都很高;在实验期间,除沙壤土外,基本上所有塔料中的U都保留在塔中,后者的污水浓度为​​进水值的3-4%。大部分U团块保留在土壤的第一个1.0厘米深处。铀的保留包括铀(Ⅳ)的沉淀和铀(Ⅵ)与土壤成分(如有机物和粘土)的结合。大部分U(VI)可逆吸附,因此很容易通过含有碳酸盐缓冲剂的水溶液从土壤中萃取出来。乙酸盐的添加稍微增强了U(VI)到U(IV)的生物还原。砂壤土废水中存在U(占进水浓度的3%至4%)表明U co

著录项

  • 作者

    Oxenberg, Tanya Palmateer.;

  • 作者单位

    The Johns Hopkins University.;

  • 授予单位 The Johns Hopkins University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Environmental.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 364 p.
  • 总页数 364
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 环境污染及其防治;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:40:04

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号