首页> 外文学位 >Parents' safety beliefs, children's work practices and childhood agricultural injury.
【24h】

Parents' safety beliefs, children's work practices and childhood agricultural injury.

机译:父母的安全观念,孩子的工作习惯和童年的农业伤害。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Family-run agricultural operations are exempt from most federal labor and safety standards, leaving parents solely responsible for monitoring children's exposures to agricultural hazards and keeping them safe. Despite the parents' pivotal role, research on parental determinants of childhood agricultural injury is lacking. This study evaluated whether children's agricultural work practices increased the risk of childhood agricultural injury, parents' safety beliefs reduced the risk of agricultural injury and were associated with chore assignments, and whether child and parent covariates predicted injury, work practices, or safety beliefs.;Analyses were based on nested case-control data, collected by the Regional Rural Injury Study-II (RRIS-II) surveillance effort in 1999 and 2001, using computer-assisted telephone interviews. Cases (n = 425) and controls (n = 1886) were persons younger than 20 years of age from Midwestern agricultural households. All injury events were selected as cases; controls were selected using incidence density sampling.;Using multivariate logistic regression, increased risks of injury were observed for children who: performed any agricultural work (odds ratio [OR] = 3.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.6-5.6); performed 7-10 chores per month compared to one chore (2.2, 1.3-3.5); worked 11-30 or 31-40 hours per week compared to 1-10 hours (1.6, 1.2-2.1 and 22, 1.3-3.7, respectively); and, performed chores an average of two-three years younger than recommended compared to performing "age-appropriate" chores (2.6, 1.44.5). Decreased risks of injury were observed for: non-working children compared to children performing minimal/safe levels of agricultural work; "moderate" versus "very strict" parental monitoring (0.70, 0.54-0.97); children of parents whose beliefs about the importance of physical readiness were more conservative (0.90, 0.70-0.99); and for females (0.50, 0.40-0.8) and working aged children (7-16 years of age, 0.70, 0.50-0.90) of parents whose beliefs about the importance of cognitive readiness were more conservative. Parents' safety beliefs were not associated with chore assignments.;This study is be first to use population-based case-control data to evaluate the risk of childhood agricultural injury associated with performing developmentally inappropriate chores and parental safety beliefs. Results suggest that the efficacy of age restrictions and parental safety beliefs for preventing the occurrence of childhood agricultural injuries warrants further evaluation.
机译:家庭经营的农业经营不受大多数​​联邦劳工和安全标准的约束,由父母全权负责监控儿童遭受农业危害的风险并保持其安全。尽管父母发挥了关键作用,但仍缺乏对儿童期农业伤害的父母决定因素的研究。这项研究评估了儿童的农业工作实践是否增加了儿童遭受农业伤害的风险,父母的安全信念降低了农业伤害的风险并与家务分配相关联,以及儿童和父母是否协变量预测了伤害,工作实践或安全信念。分析基于嵌套的病例对照数据,该数据是由1999年和2001年地区农村伤害研究II(RRIS-II)监视工作使用计算机辅助电话采访收集的。病例(n = 425)和对照(n = 1886)是来自中西部农业家庭的20岁以下的人。选择所有伤害事件作为案例;通过多因素logistic回归分析,观察到以下儿童的受伤风险增加:从事任何农业工作(赔率[OR] = 3.9,95%置信区间[CI] = 2.6-5.6);每月执行7到10份琐事,而一个琐事(2.2,1.3-3.5);每周工作11-30或31-40小时,而每周工作1-10(分别为1.6、1.2-2.1和22、1.3-3.7);与执行“适合年龄”的琐事相比,执行琐事的平均时间比建议的要少两到三岁(2.6、1.44.5)。观察到以下方面受伤的风险降低了:非工作儿童与从事农业工作的最低/安全水平的儿童相比; “中等”与“非常严格”的父母监护(0.70,0.54-0.97);对身体准备的重要性的信念较为保守的父母的孩子(0.90,0.70-0.99);对于女性(0.50,0.40-0.8)和工作年龄较大的儿童(7-16岁,0.70,0.50-0.90)的父母,他们对认知准备的重要性的看法更为保守。父母的安全信念与家务分配无关。本研究首次使用基于人群的病例对照数据评估与进行发育不当的家务和父母安全信念相关的儿童期农业伤害的风险。结果表明,年龄限制和父母安全观念在预防儿童期农业伤害发生方面的功效值得进一步评估。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Minnesota.;

  • 授予单位 University of Minnesota.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Public Health.;Health Sciences Occupational Health and Safety.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 287 p.
  • 总页数 287
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号