首页> 外文学位 >Changing United States financial structure and the theory of endogenous supply of money.
【24h】

Changing United States financial structure and the theory of endogenous supply of money.

机译:不断变化的美国金融结构和内生货币供应理论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The theory of Endogenous Supply of Money has a long history in economics, and plays an especially prominent part in modern Post Keynesian theory. Though it lends itself to various different interpretations its central proposition is a simple one: non-financial business sector's need for credit is seen as the driving force behind the process of money creation in the economy. Loans made by banks to firms return to them in the form of new deposits, which in turn lead to an increase in reserves in one way or another as well, causing the money supply to expand.; Despite this strong emphasis on commercial and industrial loans and traditional banking, the role commercial banks and depository institutions have changed significantly in the era of financial liberalization since the early 1980s, at least in the US. As competition from nondepository financial institutions increased with financial deregulation, depository institutions lost many of their advantages in attracting savings and supplying credit. Banks were thus forced to undergo dramatic changes and innovate, transforming the role banking played in money and credit creation mechanisms along the way. As a result, not only has the importance of traditional bank lending decreased in the overall credit creation process in the economy, but also the relative importance of commercial and industrial loans in banks' overall asset structure has experienced a steady decline.; Arguably, the core of endogenous money approach is still valid in that credit creation is still what lies behind money supply expansion. As commercial banks have historically been the major supplier of credit and non-financial business has been the biggest private borrower, Post Keynesian economists have traditionally focused on these two sectors. There is no intrinsic reason why the theory should be based on the assumption that non-financial businesses and banking sector are the sole determinants in the credit creation mechanism. The growing importance of the credit needs of households in financing transactions not related with Gross Domestic Product (non-GDP transactions), along with the emergence of new financial intermediaries and instruments that have transformed the process of credit creation can in principle be incorporated into the theory of endogenous money. The objective of this dissertation is to examine the way in which the theory might need to be recast if not revised in order to do so.
机译:内源性货币供应理论在经济学中具有悠久的历史,在现代后凯恩斯主义理论中扮演着特别重要的角色。尽管它适用于各种不同的解释,但其中心主张很简单:非金融业务部门对信贷的需求被视为经济中货币创造过程的推动力。银行对企业的贷款以新存款的形式返还给他们,这反过来又导致储备金以一种或另一种方式增加,导致货币供应量增加。尽管高度重视工商业贷款和传统银行业务,但自1980年代初以来,至少在美国,商业银行和存托机构的作用在金融自由化时代已发生了显着变化。随着非存款金融机构的竞争随着金融管制的放松而加剧,存款机构失去了吸引储蓄和提供信贷的许多优势。因此,银行被迫进行重大变革和创新,从而改变了银行在此过程中在货币和信贷创造机制中所扮演的角色。结果,不仅传统的银行贷款在整个信贷创造过程中的重要性下降了,而且商业和工业贷款在银行整体资产结构中的相对重要性也在稳步下降。可以说,内生货币方法的核心仍然是有效的,因为信贷创造仍然是货币供给扩张背后的原因。由于商业银行历来是信贷的主要提供者,而非金融业务一直是最大的私人借贷者,因此,凯恩斯主义后的经济学家传统上将重点放在这两个领域。没有任何内在的理由可以使该理论基于这样的假设,即非金融企业和银行部门是信贷创造机制中的唯一决定因素。原则上,可以将家庭的信贷需求在与国内生产总值(非GDP交易)无关的融资交易中的重要性日益提高,以及新的金融中介机构和工具的出现,它们已经改变了信贷创造的过程。内生货币理论。本文的目的是研究如果不进行修改就可能需要重铸该理论的方式。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ozgur, Gokcer.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Utah.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Utah.;
  • 学科 Economics Theory.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 176 p.
  • 总页数 176
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 经济学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号