首页> 外文学位 >Stay SHARP (see, hear, attend, respond, perform)---Sustaining and retraining visual-perception, motor and cognitive skills among older drivers: A feasibility project.
【24h】

Stay SHARP (see, hear, attend, respond, perform)---Sustaining and retraining visual-perception, motor and cognitive skills among older drivers: A feasibility project.

机译:保持SHARP(查看,聆听,参加,回应,执行)---在年长的驾驶员中维持和重新训练视觉,运动和认知技能:一项可行性项目。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The ability to drive an automobile is a central aspect of independent living for many older adults (Ragland, Satariano, & MacLeod, 2004). Much of the research in the field of driving and the elderly has focused on accident situations in which older drivers are over-involved, with little attention placed on developing and evaluating methods to enhance driving abilities. This thesis is comprised of two manuscripts, one examining the effectiveness of retraining programs for older drivers, and the other exploring older adults' perceptions of driving, concerns/difficulties associated with driving, and factors stimulating interest and participation in a driving program.; The first manuscript presents a systematic review of the most recent literature on evidence regarding the effectiveness of retraining programs for older drivers. Reviewed articles were grouped according to the intervention studied: physical retraining, visual perception or education. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were appraised using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale (PEDro, 2006) and interpreted following Foley's quality assessment (Foley, Teasell, Bhogal, & Speechley, 2003). Each intervention was then rated for effectiveness based on Sackett's levels of evidence (Sackett, Richardson, Rosenberg, & Haynes, 2000). Six RCTs, one pre- post-study design and one descriptive study met the inclusion criteria, one investigating physical retraining, one a visual perception intervention, five using an educational intervention and one examining a combination of all three, in addition to traffic engineering improvements. There is limited evidence that physical retraining (Level 2a) and visual perception retraining (Level 2a) improve driving related skills in older drivers. There is moderate evidence that educational interventions improve driving awareness and driving behavior (Level 1a), but do not reduce crashes (Level 1b) in older drivers. This suggests that while the evidence is limited, it is sufficiently encouraging to merit further research on interventions for healthy older drivers.; In the second manuscript, the authors explore activities seniors use driving for, when and where they drive, importance of driving, perceived driving habits, behavioral changes as people age, and factors stimulating interest and participation in a driving program. Three focus groups (n=18), conducted using a structured format, were held with former and current drivers, 75 years and older, living in Montreal, Canada. Discussions were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed to identify themes/key points. Participants reported driving for short and long-distance trips, personal and leisure activities, or in situations where walking was not practical or possible. They indicated driving during days and evenings, on city streets and highways. Frequently reported changes and difficulties included reduced evening vision, slowing response times, and road signs not being clear or visible. The principle results indicated that participants were enthusiastic about a driving program and perceived a need for content such as: traffic law refreshers, retraining of driving-related skills, as well as an on-road driving component. An objective, comprehensive clinical assessment and on-road evaluation were also deemed important. Furthermore, participants expressed preference for a program offered sometime between 11am-to-5pm for one-to-two hours, once or twice weekly. This focus group research is the first step in a research agenda aimed at developing effective and practical driving interventions for healthy older drivers based on their desired needs and interests.
机译:对于许多老年人来说,驾驶汽车的能力是独立生活的重要方面(Ragland,Satariano和MacLeod,2004年)。驾驶和老年人领域的许多研究都集中在年长驾驶员过度参与的事故情况上,而很少关注开发和评估提高驾驶能力的方法。本论文由两份手稿组成,一份研究了针对老年驾驶员的再培训计划的有效性,另一份研究了老年人对驾驶的看法,与驾驶相关的担忧/困难以及激发兴趣和参与驾驶计划的因素。第一份手稿对有关年龄较大的驾驶员进行再培训计划的有效性的证据的最新文献进行了系统综述。根据所研究的干预措施对评论文章进行分组:体育锻炼,视觉感知或教育。使用物理疗法证据数据库量表(PEDro)量表(PEDro,2006)对随机对照试验(RCT)进行评估,并根据Foley的质量评估进行解释(Foley,Teasell,Bhogal和Speechley,2003)。然后,根据Sackett的证据水平对每种干预措施的有效性进行评估(Sackett,Richardson,Rosenberg和Haynes,2000年)。六项RCT,一项研究前设计和一项描述性研究符合纳入标准,一项对身体再训练进行研究,一项对视觉感知干预进行研究,一项对教育干预进行了研究,五项对教育干预进行了研究,其中一项对所有这三项进行了综合研究,此外还改善了交通工程。仅有有限的证据表明,进行身体再训练(2a级)和视觉感知再训练(2a级)可以提高老年驾驶员的驾驶相关技能。有适度的证据表明,教育干预可以提高驾驶员的驾驶意识和驾驶行为(1a级),但不能减少老年驾驶员的撞车事故(1b级)。这表明,尽管证据有限,但仍值得鼓励对健康的老年驾驶员进行干预的进一步研究。在第二份手稿中,作者探讨了老年人用于驾驶的活动,驾驶的时间和地点,驾驶的重要性,感知的驾驶习惯,随着年龄的增长而发生的行为变化以及激发兴趣和参与驾驶计划的因素。使用结构化格式进行的三个焦点小组(n = 18)与居住在加拿大蒙特利尔的现年75岁及以上的现任司机一起举行。对讨论进行录音,转录和分析,以识别主题/重点。与会者报告说,驾车进行短途和长途旅行,个人和休闲活动,或者在步行不可行或不可能步行的情况下。他们表示白天或晚上在城市街道和高速公路上开车。经常报告的变化和困难包括夜视力降低,响应时间变慢以及路标不清晰或不可见。原则结果表明,参与者对驾驶计划充满热情,并认为需要内容,例如:交通法规更新,驾驶相关技能的再培训以及公路驾驶组件。客观,全面的临床评估和道路评估也很重要。此外,参与者表示偏好在上午11点至下午5点之间的某个时间提供一到两个小时(每周一次或两次)的程序。焦点小组研究是研究议程的第一步,旨在根据健康的老年驾驶员的期望需求和兴趣为其开发有效且实用的驾驶干预措施。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kua, Ailene.;

  • 作者单位

    McGill University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 McGill University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Gerontology.; Health Sciences Rehabilitation and Therapy.; Biology Physiology.
  • 学位 M.Sc.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 96 p.
  • 总页数 96
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 老年病学;康复医学;
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号