首页> 外文学位 >6-n-propylthiouracil: Orosensory influence on taste, diet, and chronic disease risk.
【24h】

6-n-propylthiouracil: Orosensory influence on taste, diet, and chronic disease risk.

机译:6-n-丙基硫尿嘧啶:对味觉,饮食和慢性疾病风险的嗅觉影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) is genetically determined and purported to influence diet selection though a direct effect on taste perceptions and food preferences. Studies suggest that PROP tasters, due to higher taste bud and fungiform papillae densities, are more sensitive to the bitterness of fruits and vegetables and fat in foods, and thus have lower food preferences for and intake of fruits, vegetables, and fat, than nontasters. Consequently, it has been posited that PROP taster status may serve as a "genetic taste marker" to identify individuals at increased risk for developing diet-related chronic diseases, such as obesity, cancer, and cardiovascular disease. This study took a comprehensive approach to investigating this proposal by measuring differences in orosensory responses to fat, diet selection, body composition, and serum lipids within a study population balanced for PROP taste sensitivity and gender. Fungiform papillae density, tactile acuity, and capsaicin sensitivity were also measured, and methodological issues surrounding current measurement and classification methods for determining PROP taster status were evaluated. Healthy young adults (34 men; 36 women) were classified into three PROP taster groups (nontasters, medium tasters, and supertasters) and participated in 20 test sessions during this 16-week study. PROP sensitivity was measured using four measurement methods (paper-disk, 1-, 3-, and 5-solutions of PROP and sodium chloride, NaCl), in duplicate trials, with stimuli randomly presented and nostrils blocked. Taste and fat intensity of three free fatty acids (oleic, linoleic, and stearic) in five concentrations, and fat intensity of and pleasantness for dietary fat in fat-free, reduced-fat, and regular fat versions of six commercially available foods and in five concentrations of six laboratory prepared food systems were measured. Fat stimuli were randomly presented, in duplicate, within and across subjects, with free fatty acids presented using procedures to minimize textural, visual, and olfactory cues for detecting fat. Dietary intake was measured using food frequency questionnaires and 24-hour multiple-pass recalls. A 12-week nutrition intervention focused on increasing fruits and vegetables and decreasing fat consumption was included to investigate whether PROP taste sensitivity is a barrier to adopting healthier eating habits. Body composition, heights, weights, and fasting serum lipids were measured at baseline. Analysis of 130 possible measurement/classification method combinations per trial revealed that no combination was 100% reliable, and that classification consistencies between ten published PROP taster status protocols were low, supporting this study's approach of using the same PROP taster groups to investigate the relationship between PROP sensitivity and risk factors of diet-related chronic diseases. There were no differences observed between PROP taster groups in orosensory responses to fat, intake of fruits, vegetables, and dietary fat, adiposity, body mass indices, serum cholesterol, low-density lipoproteins, or triglyceride concentrations. PROP taster status was not a barrier to medium tasters and supertasters consuming more fruits and vegetables, and nontasters consuming less dietary fat. There was no association between fat intensity and pleasantness ratings in foods, however fat intensity ratings increased across concentration gradations in free fatty acid model solutions and in laboratory prepared food systems consistent with a view that "fat" may be a sixth primary taste. Fungiform papillae densities, tactile acuity, and capsaicin sensitivity also did not differ among PROP taster groups. Collectively, these findings do not support the proposal that PROP taster status is a "genetic taste marker" to identify individuals at risk for developing diet-related chronic diseases, and suggest that PROP sensitivity is not a factor warranting consideration when developing menus, recipes, food products, or nutritional counseling and behavioral intervention strategies aimed at increasing fruits and vegetables, or decreasing dietary fat consumption.
机译:对6-正丙基硫氧嘧啶(PROP)的味觉敏感性是通过基因确定的,据称虽然对味觉和食物偏爱有直接影响,但它会影响饮食选择。研究表明,由于口味芽和真菌状乳头的密度较高,PROP品尝者对水果和蔬菜以及食物中的脂肪的苦味更敏感,因此与非食用者相比,对水果,蔬菜和脂肪的食物偏爱和摄入量较低。因此,已经提出,PROP品尝者身份可以作为“遗传口味标记”,以识别罹患与饮食相关的慢性疾病(例如肥胖症,癌症和心血管疾病)的风险增加的个体。这项研究采用了一种综合的方法来研究该提议,方法是在平衡了PROP味觉敏感性和性别的研究人群中测量对脂肪,饮食选择,身体成分和血清脂质的口感反应差异。还测量了真菌状乳头密度,触觉敏锐度和辣椒素敏感性,并评估了围绕当前测量方法和确定PROP品尝者状态的分类方法的方法论问题。健康的年轻人(34名男性; 36名女性)被分为三个PROP品尝组(非品尝者,中等品尝者和超级品尝者),并在16周的研究中参加了20次测试。使用四项测量方法(纸盘,PROP的1-,3-和5-溶液和氯化钠,NaCl)测量PROP敏感性,一式两份,随机给予刺激并阻塞鼻孔。三种浓度的三种游离脂肪酸(油酸,亚油酸和硬脂酸)的味觉和脂肪强度,以及六种市售食品的无脂,减脂和常规脂肪版本中的脂肪强度和愉快的饮食脂肪含量测量了六个浓度的六种实验室制食品系统。脂肪刺激物随机,一式两份,在受试者内和受试者之间呈递,游离脂肪酸的呈递方式应尽量减少检测脂肪的质地,视觉和嗅觉提示。使用食物频率问卷和24小时多次通过召回来测量饮食摄入量。为期12周的营养干预措施重点在于增加水果和蔬菜并减少脂肪消耗,以调查PROP味觉敏感性是否成为养成更健康饮食习惯的障碍。在基线时测量身体组成,身高,体重和空腹血脂。每个试验中对130种可能的测量/分类方法组合的分析表明,没有一种组合是100%可靠的,并且十个已发布的PROP品尝者状态协议之间的分类一致性很低,这支持了该研究使用相同PROP品尝者组研究之间的关系的方法。饮食相关慢性疾病的PROP敏感性和危险因素。在对脂肪,水果,蔬菜和饮食脂肪,肥胖,体重指数,血清胆固醇,低密度脂蛋白或甘油三酸酯浓度的口感反应中,PROP味觉组之间没有观察到差异。 PROP品尝者的身份并不妨碍中等品尝者和超级品尝者食用更多的水果和蔬菜,非品尝者食用较少的饮食脂肪。食品中的脂肪强度和令人愉快的等级之间没有关联,但是脂肪强度的等级随着游离脂肪酸模型溶液和实验室制备的食品系统中浓度梯度的增加而增加,这与“脂肪”可能是第六种主要口味相一致。在PROP品尝者组之间,真菌型乳头密度,触觉敏锐度和辣椒素敏感性也没有差异。总的来说,这些发现不支持PROP品尝者身份是“遗传口味标记”的识别提议,以识别有发展与饮食相关的慢性疾病风险的个体,并建议在制定菜单,食谱,食品,或旨在增加水果和蔬菜或减少饮食脂肪消耗的营养咨询和行为干预策略。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Purdue University.;

  • 授予单位 Purdue University.;
  • 学科 Biology Genetics.;Psychology Psychometrics.;Health Sciences Nutrition.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 295 p.
  • 总页数 295
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号