首页> 外文学位 >Performance-Based Seismic Demand Assessment of Concentrically Braced Steel Frame Buildings.
【24h】

Performance-Based Seismic Demand Assessment of Concentrically Braced Steel Frame Buildings.

机译:同心支撑钢框架建筑基于性能的抗震需求评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The special concentrically steel braced frame (SCBF) system is one of the most effective structural systems to resist lateral forces. Because of its effectiveness and straightforward design, many SCBFs are incorporated in structures throughout the world. However, the highly nonlinear behavior associated with buckling and non-ductile fracture of braces reduces the ability of the system to dissipate energy resulting in undesirable modes of behavior. While many studies have investigated the cyclic behavior of individual braces or the behavior of subassemblies, the dynamic demands on the structural system under various seismic hazard levels needs additional study for performance-based earthquake engineering.;Archetype buildings of SCBFs and buckling restrained braced frames (BRBFs) were analyzed using the computer program OpenSees (the Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation) to improve the understanding of the seismic behavior of braced frame systems, and to assess seismic demands for performance-based design. Numerical models were calibrated using test data determined from testing of conventional buckling braces, buckling restrained braces, and the braced frame specimens. In addition, fiber-based OpenSees models were constructed and compared with results of a sophisticated finite-element model that realistically captured local buckling and local fracture of structural elements. Because the OpenSees models are reasonably accurate and efficient, they were chosen to perform set of parametric computer simulations.;The seismic demands of the system and structural elements were computed and interpreted for 3-, 6-, and 16-story SCBFs and BRBFs under various hazard levels. The analysis results show large seismic demands for the 3-story SCBF, which may result in unexpected damage of structural and non-structural elements. The median expected probability of a brace buckling at one or more levels in a 3-story SCBF is more than 50% for an earthquake having a 50% probability of exceedance in 50 years (the service-level event). The possible need to replace braces following such frequent events due to brace buckling should be considered in performance-based earthquake engineering assessments. In addition, brace fracture in SCBFs is likely for an earthquake having a 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years (the MCE-level event). Analyses show that in general, BRBF models had larger drift demands and residual drifts compared to SCBF systems, because of the BRBF's longer fundamental period. However, the tendency to form a weak story in BRBFs is less than that in SCBFs.;Evaluation of seismic demand parameters were performed for 2-, 3-, 6-, 12-, and 16-story SCBFs and BRBFs, which demonstrated that short-period braced frame systems, especially SCBFs, had higher probability of collapse than longer-period braced frame systems. Substantially improved response was observed by lowering the response reduction factor of the 2-story SCBF building; this reduced the collapse risk at the hazard level of 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years. For long-period (taller) structures, although the collapse probability was lower compared to the short-period structures, weak story behavior was commonly observed in conventionally designed SCBF. A design parameter related to the ratios of story shear demand and capacity under a pushover analysis is proposed to modify member sizes to reduce weak story behavior efficiently. This is demonstrated for a 16-story SCBF building.;Regarding local deformation and force demands, simple methods to estimate out-of-plane buckling deformation of braces and column axial force demands are proposed. The investigation of system performance and member behavior provides seismic demands to more accurately assess the socio-economic losses of SCBFs and BRBFs for performance-based earthquake engineering.
机译:特殊的同心钢支撑框架(SCBF)系统是抵抗侧向力的最有效的结构系统之一。由于其有效性和直接的设计,全世界许多SCBF都被并入结构中。但是,与支架的屈曲和非延性断裂相关的高度非线性行为降低了系统耗散能量的能力,从而导致了不良的行为模式。尽管许多研究已经研究了单个支撑的周期性行为或子组件的行为,但在各种地震危险等级下对结构系统的动态要求对于基于性能的地震工程尚需进一步研究。; SCBF的原型建筑和屈曲约束的支撑框架(使用计算机程序OpenSees(地震工程仿真开放系统)对BRBFs进行了分析,以提高对支撑框架系统抗震性能的了解,并评估基于性能的设计的抗震要求。使用从常规屈曲支撑,屈曲约束支撑和支撑框架样本的测试中确定的测试数据对数值模型进行校准。此外,还构建了基于光纤的OpenSees模型,并将其与复杂的有限元模型的结果进行了比较,该模型实际捕获了结构元件的局部屈曲和局部断裂。由于OpenSees模型相当准确且有效,因此选择它们来执行一组参数计算机仿真。;在以下条件下,对3层,6层和16层SCBF和BRBF计算并解释了系统和结构元件的抗震要求各种危险等级。分析结果表明,对三层SCBF的地震要求很高,这可能会导致结构和非结构元素的意外损坏。对于在50年内发生超过50%概率的地震(服务水平事件),三层SCBF中支撑屈曲在一个或多个水平上的预期中值概率大于50%。在基于性能的地震工程评估中,应考虑由于支撑屈曲而在此类频繁发生的事件后可能需要更换支撑的情况。此外,SCBF的撑杆断裂很可能在50年内发生超过2%概率的地震中(MCE级事件)。分析表明,由于BRBF的基本周期较长,因此与SCBF系统相比,BRBF模型通常具有更大的漂移需求和剩余漂移。然而,在BRBF中形成弱势层的趋势要比在SCBF中少。;对2层,3层,6层,12层和16层SCBF和BRBF进行了地震需求参数评估,结果表明:短周期支撑框架系统(尤其是SCBF)比长周期支撑框架系统具有更高的崩溃概率。通过降低2层SCBF建筑物的响应减少因子,可以观察到响应显着改善。这在50年内以2%的概率超过危险水平降低了倒塌风险。对于长周期(塔勒)结构,虽然坍塌概率比短周期结构要低,但在常规设计的SCBF中通常观察到薄弱的故事行为。提出了一种与推力分析下的故事剪力需求与承载力之比有关的设计参数,以修改构件尺寸,以有效地减少弱故事的行为。对于一栋16层的SCBF建筑,这一点得到了证明。关于局部变形和受力需求,提出了一种简单的方法来估计支撑的平面外屈曲变形和柱轴向力需求。系统性能和成员行为的调查提供了地震需求,以便更准确地评估基于性能的地震工程的SCBF和BRBF的社会经济损失。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chen, Chui-Hsin.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 171 p.
  • 总页数 171
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号