首页> 外文学位 >Charakterisierung, Funktion und Repraesentation der Artusfigur in Wolframs von Eschenbach 'Parzival' und Adolf Muschgs 'Der Rote Ritter. Eine Geschichte von Parzival'.
【24h】

Charakterisierung, Funktion und Repraesentation der Artusfigur in Wolframs von Eschenbach 'Parzival' und Adolf Muschgs 'Der Rote Ritter. Eine Geschichte von Parzival'.

机译:Wolframs von Eschenbach的“ Parzival”和Adolf Muschgs的“红色骑士。Parzival的故事”中亚瑟王朝人物的特征,功能和表示。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A comparative analysis of the characterizations, functions, and modes of representation of King Arthur in Wolfram von Eschenbach's Parzival and Adolf Muschg's Der Rote Ritter. Eine Geschichte von Parzival reveals that both authors utilize Arthur to comment on their social and cultural environments: Wolfram portrays Arthur as an exemplary ruler, making him a powerful role model for his contemporary audience. By contrast, Muschg's highly complex Arthur functions as (self-) ironic representative of a gradually waning, decadent, albeit not entirely degenerated Arthurian world. He also reminds the reader of the civilizing impact and cultural achievements of the chivalric era as it gives way to an early-modern capitalist society.;Wolfram's approach marks a conscious departure from Chretien's passive Arthur figure in Le Conte du Graal, but his novel, all-encompassing genealogical scheme threatens to cast a shadow upon Arthur's integrity during Parzival's first visit to the Arthurian court. Wolfram here evades a negative representation by restricting Arthur's presence and moments of direct speech. Subsequent scenes, leading up to the great celebration at Joflanze in Book XV, reveal Wolfram's continued effort to improve on Arthur's character: Arthur now not only functions as chief representative of the Arthurian society, but also as an astute military leader and skilful diplomat, always acting in accord with the rules of courtly conduct and the counsel of his peers.;Muschg strips Arthur of his function as a role model, endows him with a fully-developed psyche, and confronts him with an outside world eager to transcend the chivalric mindset. He gradually exposes facets of Arthur's character that show him to be humane, resourceful, and reflective, after first creating the impression that Arthur is a shallow, powerless, and ridiculous, even repulsive figure. From the outset, Arthur is linked to the ideality represented by the Round Table and iconic Arthurian knights such as Erec, Gawan, and Lanzelot who act in full awareness of their (literary) adventures. By the end of Muschg's narrative, Arthur has evolved into the archivist of the Arthurian stories and as the keeper of the Arthurian tradition. Arthur thus functions as a counterbalance to Muschg's Arthurian society in its present, declining state.
机译:对沃尔夫拉姆·冯·埃申巴赫的《 Parzival》和阿道夫·穆奇格的《 Der Rote Ritter》中亚瑟王的特征,功能和表现方式进行了比较分析。 Eine Geschichte von Parzival透露,两位作者都利用亚瑟(Arthur)来评论他们的社会和文化环境:沃尔夫拉姆(Wolfram)将亚瑟(Arthur)描绘成模范统治者,使他成为当代观众的有力榜样。相比之下,穆什格的高度复杂的亚瑟起着逐渐消失,decade废,尽管并非完全退化的亚瑟世界的(自我)讽刺的作用。他还提醒读者注意骑士精神时代的文明影响和文化成就,因为它让位给了早期的现代资本主义社会。Wolfram的作风标志着Chretien在Le Conte du Graal中消极的Arthur形象,但他的小说《包罗万象的谱系计划有可能在Parzival首次造访Arthurian法院时为Arthur的诚信蒙上阴影。沃尔夫勒姆在这里通过限制亚瑟的出现和直接讲话的时间来逃避负面的表示。随后的场面,导致第十五本书在Joflanze举行的盛大庆祝活动,显示了Wolfram不断努力改善Arthur的性格:Arthur现在不仅担当Arthurian社会的首席代表,而且还始终是一位精明的军事领袖和熟练的外交官。遵守法庭上的行为准则和同僚的忠告。穆施格剥夺了亚瑟的榜样作用,赋予他充分发展的心态,并与渴望超越骑士精神的外界面对他。在逐渐给人以亚瑟是一个肤浅,无能,荒谬甚至令人反感的形象的印象之后,他逐渐暴露出亚瑟性格的各个方面,这表明他是人道的,机智的和反省的。从一开始,亚瑟就与圆桌会议和具有标志性的亚瑟王骑士(例如,埃雷克,加旺和兰泽洛特)代表的理想联系在一起,他们充分意识到自己的(文学)冒险经历。到Muschg的叙述结束时,亚瑟已经发展成为亚瑟王故事的档案保管员,并且是亚瑟王传统的守护者。因此,亚瑟在当今不断衰落的状态下起着抵制Muschg亚瑟社会的作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Benz, Judith Gudrun.;

  • 作者单位

    Yale University.;

  • 授予单位 Yale University.;
  • 学科 Literature Medieval.;Literature Germanic.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 281 p.
  • 总页数 281
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界文学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:39:29

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号