首页> 外文学位 >Beyond emotional cognitivism: Feelings, norms, and folk-psychological kinds.
【24h】

Beyond emotional cognitivism: Feelings, norms, and folk-psychological kinds.

机译:超越情感认知主义:感觉,规范和民间心理类型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Emotions, it is now widely agreed, are not mere sensations; they are conceptually contentful and hence norm-governed mental states. Acknowledgement of this insight, however, has left us with several deep puzzles about emotions. First, once we accept that emotions are cognitive, how do we account for the intuition that emotions involve an essential connection to feelings, even if not every token occasion of emotion is felt? Second, how can we capture the apparent distinctiveness of the norms governing emotions? Third, can we solve these two puzzles in a way that does justice to the variety of emotional phenomena while also explaining our intuition that they make up a unified class?; One source of current accounts' failures to solve these puzzles is the tacit, misguided assumption that emotions can be genuinely normative only if they can be reduced to other mental states whose normative credentials are firmly established. In this dissertation, I show that we have untapped philosophical resources for understanding emotions in their own terms. First, taking from post-Wittgensteinian philosophy of mind the insight that a single state can be both phenomenal and conceptual without being a mere aggregation of two discrete mental states, I show that the felt dimensions of emotions come within the purview of their norms; this provides the beginnings of a solution to the problem of their normative distinctness. Second, I use a neopragmatist theory of explanation according to which connections can be essential without being present on every token occasion to explain how emotions could essentially involve feelings without always being felt. Combining these tools with a methodological shift to thinking about emotions in terms of the work they do allows us to solve the remaining puzzles about emotions. Emotions, I argue, function to creatively engage us with, and sustain, objective and personal values. Attention to emotions' work reveals our folk-psychological category "emotions" to be both distinct and well formed. It is, in the end, emotions' seeming "unruliness" and incredible variety---just those aspects that seem most troubling on current accounts---that allow them to play the meaningful roles in our lives that they do.
机译:如今,人们普遍认为,情绪不仅仅是感觉。它们在概念上是有争议的,因此具有规范管理的精神状态。然而,对这种洞察力的认可使我们对情绪产生了深深的困惑。首先,一旦我们接受了情感是认知的,那么即使不是每一个短暂的情感时刻都可以感受到,我们如何解释情感与情感有着本质联系的直觉呢?第二,我们怎样才能掌握规范情感的明显表象?第三,我们能否以合理的方式解决这两个难题,同时又能解释我们的直觉,即它们构成了一个统一的阶级?经常账户未能解决这些难题的一个原因是默认的,误导性的假设,即只有将情感还原为牢固确立了规范资格的其他精神状态,情感才可以是真正的规范。在本文中,我表明,我们已经利用哲学资源来理解以自己的方式表达情感。首先,从维特根斯坦主义后的心态哲学中得出的见解,即一个状态既可以是现象性的又可以是概念性的,而不仅仅是两个离散的心理状态的总和,我证明了情感的感觉维度在其规范的范围之内。这为解决它们的规范性差异问题提供了开端。其次,我使用新实用主义的解释理论,根据这种理论,联系在每一个象征性场合都不会出现而必不可少,来解释情绪如何从本质上涉及感觉而又不总是被感觉到。将这些工具与方法转变相结合,以根据他们所做的工作来思考情绪,这使我们能够解决有关情绪的其余难题。我认为,情感的作用是使我们创造性地与客观价值观和个人价值观相结合并保持下去。对情感作品的关注揭示了我们的民间心理类别“情感”既独特又结构良好。最终,情感似乎是“不循规蹈矩的”和令人难以置信的变化-只是那些经常账户上最令人困扰的方面-才使情感能够在我们的生活中扮演有意义的角色。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hurley, Elisa Anne.;

  • 作者单位

    Georgetown University.;

  • 授予单位 Georgetown University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 356 p.
  • 总页数 356
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:39:31

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号