首页> 外文学位 >Distinguishing the neural bases of lexical access.
【24h】

Distinguishing the neural bases of lexical access.

机译:区分词汇访问的神经基础。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Much has been discovered about broad brain and language relationships from examining patterns of brain damage and their corresponding patterns of aphasia. Considerably less is known about the specifics of neural systems supporting normal access of the sound and meaning of words. The four experiments reported here concern lexical (word-level) processes, with the overall goal of distinguishing neural systems supporting lexical phonological (word form) access from those supporting lexical semantic (word meaning) access.; In the first experiment, neural correlates of lexical phonological access were addressed by manipulating word frequency in an overt picture naming task. Production of lower frequency words is thought to require additional resources primarily at the level of lexical phonological access. A group of left-sided areas including posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG), inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and occipito-temporal cortex (OT) showed activation for retrieving lower frequency words. When compared to areas which were more active for naming pictures with less familiar concepts (a semantic-level variable), effects of lower frequency words and less familiar concepts overlapped in IFG and OT, but not pSTG, identifying pSTG most specifically with lexical phonological access.; Two converging experiments examined word frequency effects during overt word pronunciation, and during auditory pseudoword repetition, the latter after incorporating a prospective "frequency" effect generated by exposing subjects to some pseudowords more than others. Effects of word frequency in the word pronunciation experiment overlapped those in picture naming in IFG, and the effect of pseudoword frequency overlapped that from picture naming in pSTG.; The fourth and final experiment examined lexical semantic access using a lexical decision task, where the variable of interest was word meaning relatedness. Left-hemisphere activation occurred in OT, overlapping with effects of concept familiarity in the picture naming task, identifying this area most specifically with accessing lexical semantic representations.; These results are consistent with a model in which retrieval of lexical phonology is processed by pSTG, and lexical semantics by OT, with the two processes sharing and possibly being bound together during production by IFG.
机译:通过检查脑损伤的模式及其相应的失语症,已发现有关广泛的大脑和语言关系的许多信息。关于支持正常访问单词的声音和词义的神经系统的具体知识,了解得很少。这里报告的四个实验涉及词汇(单词级)过程,其总体目标是将支持词汇语音(单词形式)访问的神经系统与支持词汇语义(单词含义)访问的神经系统区分开。在第一个实验中,通过在公开的图片命名任务中操纵单词频率来解决词汇语音访问的神经相关性。低频单词的产生被认为主要在词汇语音访问水平上需要额外的资源。包括后颞上回(pSTG),额下回(IFG)和枕颞皮(OT)在内的一组左侧区域显示出了激活功能,可检索较低频率的单词。与那些名称较少的概念(语义级别的变量)更积极地命名图片的区域相比,IFG和OT中低频词和名称较少的概念的影响重叠,但pSTG却不重叠,从而最具体地通过词汇语音访问识别pSTG 。;两个收敛的实验检查了在明显的单词发音期间和在听觉伪单词重复过程中的单词频率效应,后者是在合并预期的“频率”效应之后产生的,该“频率”效应是通过使主体比其他伪单词更多地暴露于某些伪单词而产生的。单词发音实验中单词频率的影响与IFG中图片命名的影响重叠,而伪单词频率的影响与pSTG中图片命名的影响重叠。第四个也是最后一个实验使用词汇决策任务检查了词汇语义访问,其中感兴趣的变量是词义相关性。左半球激活发生在OT中,与图片命名任务中概念熟悉的效果重叠,最具体地通过访问词汇语义表示来识别该区域。这些结果与一个模型一致,在该模型中,通过pSTG处理词汇语音,并通过OT处理词汇语义,两个过程在IFG的生成过程中共享并可能绑定在一起。

著录项

  • 作者

    Graves, William Wyatt.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Iowa.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Iowa.;
  • 学科 Biology Neuroscience.; Psychology Experimental.; Psychology Cognitive.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 198 p.
  • 总页数 198
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 神经科学;心理学;心理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号