首页> 外文学位 >'Virginia divided; the Union dissolved': Geography in American democracy and the lessons of West Virginia.
【24h】

'Virginia divided; the Union dissolved': Geography in American democracy and the lessons of West Virginia.

机译:“弗吉尼亚分裂;联盟解体”:美国民主地理和西弗吉尼亚州的教训。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Over four centuries, Americans spread out across a continent marked by extreme geographic variety. Local landscapes influenced regional identities, molded economic and social communities, and shaped the kinds of governance Americans wanted for themselves. Although the Constitution designed a flexible federal republic to accommodate both regional and national priorities, conflict between geographically defined sections has threatened to scuttle the Union more than once. Ongoing sectional differences raise the question of whether the United States is in fact too geographically diverse to function successfully as one political unit.;Prior to 1863, West Virginia was but a section of a larger Virginia, separated from eastern Virginia by mountains. This physical barrier contributed to a mental, economic, and political separation that ended in western Virginia's secession from the Old Dominion and the formation of a new state. The geographic context of this conflict makes it an ideal case study for assessing the role of geography in the twenty-first century Union.;In Size and Democracy, political theorists Robert Dahl and Edward Tufte offer strategies for alleviating internal political conflict; yet the last concedes that if other measures fail to promote good government the only answer may be the dissolution of the state. An examination of Virginia's political history to 1863 reveals firstly how the state's geography influenced the development of separate societies to the east and west, and secondly how each of Dahl and Tufte's initial strategies failed to ease western Virginia's grievances with the state's central government, leading them to take the final step towards secession from the commonwealth. This study draws direct lines between the natural environment, the political preferences of the people who lived there, and the quality of the governance they received.;This study found that geography does play an undeniable and deterministic role in democratic government, but that disparate geography does not make political failure inevitable. Human beings, after all, are sentient players with the ability to reason and compromise at will. Compromise, however, is necessary if a large polity is to survive; if American democracy is going to continue, Americans must rise above their geography to do it.
机译:在四个多世纪的时间里,美国人遍布了一个以极端地理多样性为标志的大陆。当地的风光影响了地区认同感,塑造了经济和社会共同体,并塑造了美国人想要的治理类型。尽管《宪法》设计了一个灵活的联邦共和国来适应地区和国家的优先事项,但地理上各部门之间的冲突威胁着不只一次地破坏联盟。持续的地区分歧提出了一个问题,即美国实际上是否在地理上过于多样化而无法成功地作为一个政治部门发挥作用。1863年之前,西弗吉尼亚州只是一个较大的弗吉尼亚州的一部分,与弗吉尼亚州东部被山脉隔开。这种物质上的障碍导致了精神,经济和政治上的分离,最终导致西弗吉尼亚州脱离旧统治,并建立了一个新州。这场冲突的地理背景使其成为评估地理在二十一世纪联盟中的作用的理想案例研究。在规模与民主方面,政治理论家罗伯特·达尔和爱德华·塔夫特提出了缓解内部政治冲突的策略;但最后承认,如果其他措施未能促进善政,唯一的答案可能是国家解体。对弗吉尼亚州至1863年的政治历史的考察表明,首先,该州的地理环境如何影响东西方独立社会的发展;其次,达尔和塔夫特的最初战略如何未能缓解西弗吉尼亚州对州中央政府的不满,从而导致了他们的不满。迈出从联邦分离的最后一步。这项研究在自然环境,居住在那里的人们的政治偏好与他们所获得的治理质量之间划出了直接的界线;这项研究发现地理确实在民主政府中扮演着不可否认和确定性的角色,但地理却截然不同并不能避免政治失败。毕竟,人类是有见识的玩家,具有随意推理和妥协的能力。但是,如果要维持一个大政体,就必须妥协。如果美国民主制度要继续下去,那么美国人必须超越自己的地域才能做到这一点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Altman, Victoria B.;

  • 作者单位

    Georgetown University.;

  • 授予单位 Georgetown University.;
  • 学科 American history.;American studies.;Geography.
  • 学位 M.A.L.S.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 161 p.
  • 总页数 161
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号