首页> 外文学位 >Building institutional capacity for informed decision making to enhance student learning outcomes.
【24h】

Building institutional capacity for informed decision making to enhance student learning outcomes.

机译:建立机构能力以进行明智的决策,以增强学生的学习成果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Although a good deal has been written on accountability, accreditation, assessment, and institutional effectiveness, there is a dearth of examples from Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) about how they use these processes for institutional improvement. Given the press for institutions to provide evidence of their impact on student learning, resource-dependent HBCUs are challenged to meet such demands. The purpose of this research was to better understand factors that compelled one institution to become more data-centered in its decision making in order to affect student learning outcomes. Using qualitative methods, the study attempted to answer the following research questions: (1) what aspects of the organizational environment (both internal and external) influence the decision-making process; (2) how does the institution's infrastructure (i.e., resources---people, finances, decision support) facilitate the decision-making process; and (3) what impact does the decision-making process have on student learning?; A case study was conducted that included twenty-five administrators and faculty members during two multiple-day site visits. Dawson State University (DSU) was chosen because of its progressive efforts to utilize its National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) data for institutional improvement initiatives. However, the study focused on multiple institutional approaches for using data and information in decision making. One of the major findings is that the decision-making process became more collaborative in large part because of the president's leadership style and because of the emergence of a structure to provide timely and accurate decision support. External pressures for accountability, accreditation, and labor markets worked together to move the institution toward a data-informed decision-making process. In addition, participants expressed the importance of having quality decision support. The results suggest that when a president models data-based decision making, others are likely to embrace it and that access to quality decision support is essential to develop a "culture of evidence" and a framework for enhancing student success and educational attainment.; Implications are offered for college presidents, administrators, and faculty interested in the essentials for realizing a culture of evidence. Recommendations include adding to the culture of evidence literature by conducting additional research at minority-serving institutions.
机译:尽管在问责制,认证,评估和机构有效性方面已经写了很多文章,但历史上黑人大学(HBCU)缺乏有关如何使用这些过程来进行机构改进的示例。鉴于要求机构提供证据证明其对学生学习的影响,资源依赖型HBCU面临着满足此类需求的挑战。这项研究的目的是更好地理解促使一个机构在决策中变得更加以数据为中心的因素,从而影响学生的学习成果。该研究使用定性方法试图回答以下研究问题:(1)组织环境的哪些方面(内部和外部)都影响决策过程; (2)机构的基础设施(即资源-人员,财务,决策支持)如何促进决策过程; (3)决策过程对学生的学习有什么影响?进行了一个案例研究,在两次为期多天的现场访问中,包括25名管理人员和教职员工。选择道森州立大学(DSU)是因为其不断努力将其国家学生参与度调查(NSSE)数据用于机构改进计划。但是,研究集中于在决策中使用数据和信息的多种制度方法。主要发现之一是,决策过程变得更加协作,这在很大程度上是因为总统的领导风格以及由于出现了提供及时,准确的决策支持的结构。问责制,认证和劳动力市场的外部压力共同作用,使该机构朝着以数据为依据的决策过程前进。此外,与会人员表示了获得质量决策支持的重要性。结果表明,当一位校长为基于数据的决策建模时,其他人很可能会接受它,并且获得质量决策支持对于建立“证据文化”和增强学生成功和教育水平的框架至关重要。对于对实现证据文化的基本知识感兴趣的大学校长,行政管理人员和教职员工提供了一些启示。建议包括通过在少数族裔服务机构进行额外的研究来增加证据文化。

著录项

  • 作者

    Morelon, Carla L.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana University.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana University.;
  • 学科 Education Higher.; Education Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 215 p.
  • 总页数 215
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 高等教育 ; 教育 ;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号