首页> 外文学位 >Famine as a function of empire in 'Arrow of God' and 'Star of the Sea'.
【24h】

Famine as a function of empire in 'Arrow of God' and 'Star of the Sea'.

机译:饥荒是帝国在《神之箭》和《海洋之星》中的作用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper speaks to several broad questions about the relationship between culture and nature as represented in Chinua Achebe's novel Arrow of God and and Joseph O'Connor's novel Star of the Sea: How are the categories nature and culture constructed through colonial and scientific discourses? To what extent do Achebe and O'Connor engage in discourses that frame nature and culture as inextricable categories? What worldviews are inchoate to competing discourses about nature and culture, and how are these worldviews negotiated in the texts? And finally, despite colonialism's difference in kind between Ireland and Nigeria, how do O'Connor and Achebe both present ecological distress as a long term consequence of colonialism? The truly fascinating aspect of pairing these texts together emerges from the observation that O'Connor and Achebe approach their representations of competing worldviews with drastically different motivations in mind. While O'Connor's text clearly calls the British Empire to task for its involvement in the deaths and emigration of millions of Irish people during the Great Famine, Achebe's novel uses a more self-reflective lens. While both novels use famine as a locus for discussing colonialism's wide scale disruptiveness, Achebe's famine is also an accusation in the vein of Davis's graphic images, but it is an accusation against Igbo people rather than empire because famine in Arrow of God is represented as the drastic consequence of betraying Igbo ways of life through embracing colonial ones.
机译:本文就奇努阿·阿切贝的小说《上帝之箭》和约瑟夫·奥康纳的小说《海洋之星》中代表的文化与自然之间的关系提出了几个广泛的问题:如何通过殖民和科学话语建构自然和文化的范畴?阿契比和奥康纳在何种程度上将自然和文化归为不可分割的范畴?对于自然和文化的竞争性论述,什么样的世界观是很重要的?在文本中如何协商这些世界观?最后,尽管殖民主义在爱尔兰和尼日利亚之间存在种种差异,但奥康纳和阿奇贝又如何作为殖民主义的长期后果而造成生态危机?将这些文本组合在一起的真正迷人之处在于观察到O'Connor和Achebe怀着截然不同的动机接近竞争世界观的表现。奥康纳(O'Connor)的案文明确要求大英帝国为参与大饥荒期间数百万爱尔兰人的死亡和移徙承担责任,而阿奇贝(Achebe)的小说则使用了更加自省的镜头。尽管两部小说都以饥荒为讨论殖民主义大规模破坏性的根源,但阿奇贝的饥荒也是戴维斯图形图像中的指责,但这是针对伊博人的指控,而不是帝国的指责,因为《上帝之箭》中的饥荒被表述为通过拥抱殖民地生活而背叛伊博族生活方式的严重后果。

著录项

  • 作者

    Conley, Erin B.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Kansas.;

  • 授予单位 University of Kansas.;
  • 学科 Literature Modern.;Sociology Environmental Justice.;Literature English.;Agriculture General.;Literature African.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 39 p.
  • 总页数 39
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号