首页> 外文学位 >The last stand of the Great American Carbonate Bank: Tectonic activation of the Upper Ordovician passive margin in eastern North America.
【24h】

The last stand of the Great American Carbonate Bank: Tectonic activation of the Upper Ordovician passive margin in eastern North America.

机译:美国大碳酸盐银行的最后一站:北美东部上奥陶纪被动缘的构造活化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Upper Ordovician (450-460 Ma) Chazy, Black River and Trenton groups of eastern North America record the tectonic activation of a passive carbonate platform. Associated with tectonic collision and development of a peripheral-type foreland basin, the tectonic history is complicated by the occurrence of two basin-forming episodes. Although considered analogous by previous authors, a growing list of observations indicate that the stratigraphic record from both foreland basins and their coeval Great American Carbonate Bank (GACB) contain somewhat different, non-analogous, signatures. A number of key issues arise when comparing both tectonic episodes. These include: (1) non-analogous spatial-temporal scales whereby the northern (Vermontian) tectophase is much larger and of longer duration compared to the southern (Blountian) tectophase; (2) sedimentary provenance analyses show a more mafic contribution in the northern basin fill compared to that of the southern basin; (3) the position of K-bentonite swarms relative to basin filling phases is non-analogous; and (4) the location and timing of Ordovician volcanism/plutonism shows a pronounced change after the first tectophase.;Thus, important research questions for this study include: (A) How does the architecture of the foreland basin complex and adjacent GACB change spatially and temporally during each distinct tectophase?; (B) Can provenance differences between tectophases be explained relative to tectonic events in the orogen?; (C) What is the timing and significance of K-bentonite position and timing of plutonism/volcanism relative to foreland basin fill episodes?; (4) What inferences are gained from theoretical modeling of load geometries and foreland basin evolution when considered with empirical data from the Taconic Orogeny; and (5) Is a new model for the Taconic Orogeny needed to explain the growing list of incongruities?;In order to investigate these questions, a refined, high-resolution, sequence stratigraphic framework has been constructed and utilized to re-calibrate Upper Ordovician strata during the last stand of the GACB. The refined framework was constructed using the occurrence of sequence boundaries, erosional surfaces, transgressive, highstand, and regressive systems tracts, hardgrounds and flooding surfaces, laterally extensive and unique lithofacies, highly repetitive sub-meter scale cyclic intervals, updated macrofaunal and microfaunal biostratigraphies, as well as known chemostratigraphic and event stratigraphic data (Nd, C, & Sr isotopic excursions, K-bentonite horizons, seismite horizons, etc.). Also defined for the first time are a number of time-restricted facies including widespread siliciclastic events, chert-rich intervals, and pronounced calcification events. As such, an improved temporal and spatial chronology of thirteen time-slices (∼1 million year duration) has been produced for the Ashbyan, Mohawkian, to earliest Cincinnatian interval.;This integrated stratigraphic model is used to link the sedimentary record of the foreland basin complex to climatic changes, sea-level oscillation, and specific tectonic events in the orogen. These data provide an understanding of the evolution of the foreland basin and its subcomponents including the backbulge, forebulge, and foredeep basins. Moreover, coupled with newly calibrated strontium isotopic curves, this study has allowed for the development of a new model for the Taconic Orogeny that helps to explain differences in the timing and spatial relationships between the southern and northern tectophases.
机译:北美东部的上奥陶纪(450-460 Ma)查兹,黑河和特伦顿群记录了被动碳酸盐台地的构造活动。与构造碰撞和外围型前陆盆地的发展相关,构造历史因两次盆地形成事件的发生而变得复杂。尽管以前的作者认为是相似的,但越来越多的观察结果表明,前陆盆地及其同期的美国大碳酸盐银行(GACB)的地层记录都包含一些不同的,非相似的特征。比较两个构造事件时会出现许多关键问题。其中包括:(1)非类似的时空尺度,与南部(Blountian)时期相比,北部(佛蒙特州)时期较大,持续时间更长; (2)沉积物源分析表明,与南部盆地相比,北部盆地充填物中镁铁矿的贡献更大; (3)钾膨润土群相对于盆地充填阶段的位置是非相似的; (4)奥陶纪火山活动/岩体活动的位置和时间在第一个构造阶段后发生了显着变化。因此,这项研究的重要研究问题包括:(A)前陆盆地复合体和邻近的GACB的结构在空间上如何变化?在每个不同的构造期和时间上? (B)相对于造山带中的构造事件,可以解释构造期之间的物源差异吗? (C)相对于前陆盆地充填事件,钾膨润土的位置和时间的重要性和意义是什么? (4)结合塔科尼克造山带的经验数据,从载荷几何形状和前陆盆地演化的理论模型中得出什么推论; (5)是否需要一个新的塔康尼克造山带模型来解释越来越多的不一致性?;为了研究这些问题,已经构造了一个精细的高分辨率层序地层框架,并利用它重新校准了奥陶纪上层。 GACB最后一站期间的地层。精炼的框架是根据层序边界,侵蚀面,海侵,高位和回归系,硬地基和洪水面,横向广泛而独特的岩相,高度重复的亚米级循环层段,更新的宏观和微真菌生物地层学,以及已知的化学地层和事件地层数据(Nd,C和Sr同位素偏移,钾膨润土层,地震岩层等)。还首次定义了一些限时相,包括广泛的硅质碎屑事件,富集石的间隔和明显的钙化事件。这样一来,莫霍克山脉的阿什比亚人(Ashbyan,Mohawkian)的辛辛那提时间间隔最早的十三个时间片(持续时间约一百万年)的时间和空间时间顺序得到了改善;该综合地层模型用于链接前陆的沉积记录。盆地复杂于气候变化,海平面振荡以及造山带中特定的构造事件。这些数据提供了对前陆盆地及其子组件(包括后隆,前隆和前深盆地)演变的理解。此外,再加上新校准的锶同位素曲线,这项研究为Taconic造山运动开发了一个新模型,该模型有助于解释南部和北部构造相时间和空间关系的差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cornell, Sean Richard.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Cincinnati.;

  • 授予单位 University of Cincinnati.;
  • 学科 Geology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 868 p.
  • 总页数 868
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 地质学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号