首页> 外文学位 >Shaping affluent societies: Divergent paths to mass consumer society in West Germany and the United States during the postwar boom era.
【24h】

Shaping affluent societies: Divergent paths to mass consumer society in West Germany and the United States during the postwar boom era.

机译:塑造富裕的社会:战后繁荣时期,西德和美国通往大众消费社会的途径不同。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation is a comparative study of mass consumption in postwar West Germany and the United States. It engages three vital dimensions of consumer modernity: the role of the state, the role of society, and the role of space. The study questions the notion of a postwar hegemony of the American model of mass consumption and investigates the interplay of economic, political, social and cultural factors to fully understand the persistence of differences between both countries.;The second section turns to the consumers and the different social contexts in which they consume. Household consumption patterns in both countries differ significantly immediately after the war, with German consumers spending a much larger portion of their income on food. As disposable income levels begin to converge, however, important differences remain. American consumer spending is much more focused on the automobile, the suburban home and the appliances that fill it---a middle class model of consumption. German household spending and consumer expectations continued to show significant differences by class. Much less than their American counterparts did Germans link the possibility of upward social mobility with the adoption of particular patterns of material consumption. This is illustrated by differences in the use of consumer credit. Whereas consumer credit skyrocketed in the United States after World War II, widely hailed as a democratic means to access the American standard of living, Germans remain largely reluctant to embrace this form of financing consumption. The striking difference in consumer debt still by 1970 points to different cultural attitudes towards consumption, but also brings us back to the impact of public policy. While Americans were reluctant to dip into their savings for the purchase of consumer durables, saving for consumption became common practice for German consumers backed by a more expansive social welfare state.;Intimately linked to public policy and social practice, the space of consumption accounts for a third area of significant divergence between both consumer societies. Germans "consumed" space differently from Americans. Public housing programs and urban development (e.g. public transportation) contributed to the continuity of an urban pattern of consumption in Germany. A nation of renters, working class as well as middle class Germans were more likely to live in urban apartments than in suburban houses. Infrastructure programs for automobile traffic and subsidized mortgages, on the other hand, enticed Americans to move to the suburbs. The landscape of retailing changed accordingly. Tax exemptions and permissive zoning fueled the rise of suburban shopping centers and large supermarkets. City planners and state regulation in Germany helped preserve a retail structure in Germany centered on smaller stores in urban neighborhoods and city centers.;Public policy, consumer choices (informed by both cultural attitudes and economic restraints), and differences in geographic lay-out and use of space account for the emergence of two different paths to consumer modernity during the postwar decades. In the American case, these choices favored suburban housing and consumption patterns that centered on durable goods and the private home. West Germans did not fully embrace this model of mass consumption. Private prosperity was for many Germans more intimately tied to public spending. Despite modernization, familiar urban forms of consumption were retained and class and milieu differences continued to play a significant role. While some of these differences have somewhat subsided since the 1970s, the choices made in both societies during the formative postwar decades still inform mass consumption practices and the relationship between public and private consumption in Germany and the United States today. (Abstract shortened by UMI.).;In a first section I engage questions about the impact of public policy in shaping modern consumption patterns. I argue against the notion that the postwar boom in consumption was largely determined by the free play of the market. In both countries politics shaped mass consumption, albeit in different ways. Since the New Deal era, fostering mass demand had become an integral part of economic growth policies in the United States. But the extent of overt public consumption and economic redistribution was consciously limited. Instead, the 1950s saw the growth of what has been called a "hidden welfare state" of tax exemptions, loan guarantees, and subsidies that helped promote a pattern of private suburban middle class consumption. In Germany, public consumption was to play a much bigger role. Both conservative and social-democratic considerations led to state intervention in several areas. Expanded social-security and assistance programs indexed for a rising standard of living enabled access to mass consumption. Public spending on housing, health-care and transportation altered incentives for private consumer spending.
机译:本文是对战后西德和美国大众消费的比较研究。它涉及消费者现代性的三个重要方面:国家的角色,社会的角色和空间的角色。该研究对战后美国大规模消费模式霸权的概念提出了质疑,并调查了经济,政治,社会和文化因素之间的相互作用,以充分理解两国之间持续存在的分歧。第二部分转向消费者和消费者。他们消费的不同社会环境。战后,这两个国家的家庭消费方式明显不同,德国消费者将其收入的很大一部分用于食品消费。但是,随着可支配收入水平开始趋同,重要的区别仍然存在。美国的消费者支出更多地集中在汽车,郊区住宅和填充汽车的家电上,这是一种中产阶级的消费模式。德国家庭支出和消费者期望继续显示出明显的阶级差异。与美国人相比,德国人将社会向上流动的可能性与采用特定物质消费方式联系起来的可能性要小得多。消费信贷的使用差异说明了这一点。第二次世界大战后,美国的消费者信贷激增,被广泛认为是获得美国生活水准的一种民主手段,而德国人仍然不愿接受这种形式的融资消费。到1970年,消费者债务的显着差异仍然表明对消费的不同文化态度,但也使我们回到了公共政策的影响上。尽管美国人不愿为购买耐用消费品而投入积蓄,但以储蓄为目的的消费已成为德国消费者的一种普遍做法,并得到了更广泛的社会福利国家的支持。;与公共政策和社会实践紧密相关的是,消费空间占了两个消费者社会之间存在重大分歧的第三个领域。德国人“消耗”的空间与美国人不同。公共住房计划和城市发展(例如公共交通)为德国城市消费模式的持续性做出了贡献。一个由租房者,工人阶级和中产阶级德国人组成的国家比城市郊区的房子更有可能居住在城市公寓中。另一方面,汽车交通和补贴抵押贷款的基础设施计划诱使美国人迁往郊区。零售业也发生了变化。免税和许可区划推动了郊区购物中心和大型超市的兴起。德国的城市规划者和国家法规帮助保留了以城市社区和市中心的较小商店为中心的德国零售结构。;公共政策,消费者选择(受文化态度和经济限制所影响)以及地理布局和战后数十年来,空间的使用导致了消费者现代化的两种不同途径的出现。以美国为例,这些选择有利于郊区住房和消费模式,这些模式以耐用品和私人住宅为中心。西德人没有完全接受这种大众消费模式。私人繁荣对许多德国人来说与公共支出有着更紧密的联系。尽管进行了现代化改造,人们熟悉的城市消费形式仍得以保留,阶级和环境差异继续发挥重要作用。尽管这些差异中的一些差异自1970年代以来已经有所缓和,但在战后的几十年中,两个社会所做的选择仍然为大众消费行为以及当今德国和美国的公共和私人消费之间的关系提供了信息。 (摘要由UMI缩短。);在第一部分中,我讨论了有关公共政策对塑造现代消费模式的影响的问题。我反对这样的观点,即战后的消费热潮在很大程度上取决于市场的自由发挥。在这两个国家,政治塑造了大众消费,尽管方式不同。自新政时代以来,促进大众需求已成为美国经济增长政策不可或缺的一部分。但是,有意识地限制了公开的公共消费和经济再分配的程度。取而代之的是,1950年代出现了免税,贷款担保和补贴的所谓“隐性福利国家”的增长,这有助于促进郊区中产阶级私人消费的模式。在德国,公共消费将发挥更大的作用。保守和社会民主主义的考虑都导致国家在几个领域进行干预。以生活水平提高为指标的扩大的社会保障和援助计划使人们能够获得大众消费。住房公共支出,医疗保健和交通运输改变了私人消费者支出的激励机制。

著录项

  • 作者

    Logemann, Jan L.;

  • 作者单位

    The Pennsylvania State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Pennsylvania State University.;
  • 学科 Modern history.;European history.;American history.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 428 p.
  • 总页数 428
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号