首页> 外文学位 >Investigation of circulating fluidized bed riser and downer reactor performance for catalytic ozone decomposition.
【24h】

Investigation of circulating fluidized bed riser and downer reactor performance for catalytic ozone decomposition.

机译:循环流化床提升管和下降管反应器催化臭氧分解性能的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Catalytic ozone decomposition reaction was employed to study the characteristics of the gas-solid circulating fluidized bed (CFB) riser and downer reactors. Optical fiber probes and an ultraviolet (UV) ozone analyzer were used to obtain a complete mapping of local solids holdup, particle velocity, and ozone concentration profiles at different axial and radial positions in a 76 mm i.d., 10.2m high riser and a 76 mm i.d., 5.8 m high downer reactors. The superficial gas velocity (Ug) and the solids circulation rate (Gs) were 2∼5 m/s and 50-100 kg/(m2·s), respectively. Based on the spatial distributions of catalyst particles and gas reactant in the riser and the downer reactors, hydrodynamics and reactor performance were related. Further, comparisons between the riser and the downer reactors were made.;Solids flow developed much slower in the riser than in the downer. Negative particle velocity was observed in the near-wall region for nearly the entire height ofthe riser. The average particle velocity for the entire riser was 0.8∼0.96 times higher than the superficial gas velocity, and increased with increasing superficial gas velocity and decreasing solids circulation rate. However, in the downer the average particle velocity was 1.13∼2.13 times higher the superficial gas velocity, and increased with both superficial gas velocity and solids circulation rate.;Axial ozone concentration profiles were significantly deviating from plug-flow behavior. Very strong interrelation was observed between the spatial distributions of solids and gas reactant. Higher local solids holdups will give lower ozone concentrations. Higher solids holdup in the riser led to higher conversion than that in the downer for the same operating condition. Most conversion occurred in the entrance region or flow developing zone of the riser and downer reactors. Radial gradients of the reactant concentration increased with the height in the riser, whereas in the downer maximum gradients occurred in the mid-section of the reactor column. For both the riser and the downer reactors, the radial gradients of the reactant concentration decreased with superficial gas velocity and solids circulation rate.;Contact efficiency was introduced to account for the incomplete contacting between gas and solid phases. Overall contact efficiency in the downer was higher than that in the riser, and increased with increasing superficial gas velocity and decreasing solids circulation rate. At different heights of the riser and downer reactors, gas-solid contact efficiency was high in the flow developing zone and decreased with height in the fully developed flow zone. Strong turbulence in the entrance region was attributed for high contact efficiency in this region.;Under the above operating conditions, axial solids holdup profiles in the riser and the downer could be approximated by an exponential decay function: the solids holdup was high in the flow developing region and gradually decreased downstream in the fully developed region. The radial gradients of the solids holdup profiles in the riser were much higher than those in the downer, showing that the downer had much more uniform solids distribution. The average solids holdup for the entire riser reactor was about 1.5 times higher than the predicted value from Gs/(rhopU g). However, for the downer reactor this ratio dropped to 0.45∼0.98 which increased with increasing superficial gas velocity and decreasing solids circulation rate.;Rotational asymmetry of reactant concentrations was observed in the CFB riser reactor, which was mainly an effect of the solids entrance structure. The asymmetrical reactant distribution extended to some height less than the length of the flow developing zone, and then disappeared. This asymmetry decreased with superficial gas velocity and increased with solids circulation rate. In the solids entrance region, multiple angular measurements were suggested to provide a better representation of the true reactant concentration.;Keywords: Circulating fluidized bed riser/downer, hydrodynamics, reactor performance, catalytic ozone decomposition, solids holdup, particle velocity, solids flux, gas-solid contact efficiency, rotational asymmetry.
机译:利用催化臭氧分解反应研究了气固循环流化床(CFB)上升和下降反应器的特性。使用光纤探头和紫外线(UV)臭氧分析仪在76 mm内径,10.2m高立管和76 mm内径中,获得了不同轴向和径向位置的局部固体含量,颗粒速度和臭氧浓度曲线的完整图。 id,5.8 m高的唐纳反应堆。表观气体速度(Ug)和固体循环速率(Gs)分别为2〜5 m / s和50-100 kg /(m2·s)。根据提升管和下降管反应器中催化剂颗粒和气体反应物的空间分布,研究了流体动力学和反应器性能。此外,还进行了提升管和下降管反应器之间的比较。上升管中的固体流动比下降管中的固体流动慢得多。在近壁区域,上升管的几乎整个高度都观察到负粒子速度。整个提升管的平均颗粒速度比表观气体速度高0.8〜0.96倍,并且随着表观气体速度的增加和固体循环速率的降低而增加。然而,在下降器中,平均颗粒速度是表观气体速度的1.13〜2.13倍,并且随着表观气体速度和固体循环速率的增加而增加。轴向臭氧浓度分布显着偏离活塞流行为。在固体和气体反应物的空间分布之间观察到非常强的相互关系。较高的局部固体含量将降低臭氧浓度。在相同的工作条件下,提升管中较高的固形物含量比下降器中的固形物含量更高。大部分转化发生在上升和下降反应器的入口区域或流动发展区。反应物浓度的径向梯度随立管高度的增加而增加,而在下降管中,最大梯度发生在反应器塔的中部。对于上升反应器和下降反应器,反应物浓度的径向梯度随表观气体速度和固体循环速率而降低。;引入接触效率以解决气相和固相之间的不完全接触。下降管中的总接触效率高于上升管中的总接触效率,并且随着表观气体速度的增加和固体循环速率的降低而增加。在上升反应器和下降反应器的不同高度处,气固接触效率在流动展开区较高,而在完全展开的流动区则随高度降低。在入口区域中强烈的湍流归因于该区域的高接触效率。在上述操作条件下,立管和下降管中的轴向固体持留曲线可通过指数衰减函数来近似:流动中的固体持留率很高发达地区,下游逐渐减少。提升管中固体滞留曲线的径向梯度比下降管中的高得多,这表明下降管的固体分布更加均匀。整个提升管反应器的平均固体含量约为Gs /(rhopU g)预测值的1.5倍。然而,对于下降式反应器,该比率下降至0.45-0.98,随着表观气体速度的增加和固体循环速率的降低而增加。; CFB上升式反应器中观察到反应物浓度的旋转不对称,这主要是固体入口结构的影响。 。不对称反应物分布延伸到小于流动发生区的长度的某个高度,然后消失。这种不对称性随着表观气体速度的降低而减小,并随着固体循环速率的增加而增大。在固体入口区域,建议进行多个角度测量以更好地表示真实的反应物浓度。关键词:循环流化床提升管/下降管,流体动力学,反应器性能,催化臭氧分解,固体滞留,颗粒速度,固体通量,气固接触效率,旋转不对称。

著录项

  • 作者

    Li, Dongbing.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Western Ontario (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 The University of Western Ontario (Canada).;
  • 学科 Engineering Chemical.;Energy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 299 p.
  • 总页数 299
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号