首页> 外文学位 >A modified Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests.
【24h】

A modified Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests.

机译:修改后的Bonferroni程序可用于多个测试。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Bonferroni adjustment ensures that the overall probability of Type I error is below the nominal level when multiple tests are performed. However, the method results in a Type I error rate that is well below the nominal level. Researchers developed modified Bonferroni methods to improve statistical power. Many of these modifications sequentially test observed p-values. The most common modified Bonferroni method is the Holm method, which tests observed p-values using alpha/(k - 1 + i) beginning with the smallest and testing the largest observed p-value using alpha. The purpose of this research was to establish an improved single step method for multiple tests based on the Bonferroni adjustment. The multiple tests used in this investigation were tests of regression coefficients. This new method was compared to the Bonferroni and Holm methods to evaluate statistical power while maintaining a probability of Type I error that was less than or equal to the nominal level. The data used in this research were simulated using SAS 9.1. Sample data (n = 25, 50, 200) were simulated to have normal distributions for hypothesis testing of k = 3, 4, 5, ..., 20 regression coefficients. Correlation strength between x and y (.3, .5) and among the x's (.0, .1, .3) was varied. The proportion of non-zero relationships between x and y (P_NON) was varied from 0 to a maximum of .75 and was dependent on the number of tests performed. Based on the results, a new denominator was determined that was less than k. The formula to calculate the new value for the denominator was k - (k -1)P_NON. The new method resulted in Type I error that ranged from .0242 to .0579 while the Bonferroni method ranged from .0103 to .0579 and Holm method ranged from .0113 to .0579. The smallest statistical power that occurred was .00451 (New), .00286 (Bonferroni), and .00350 (Holm). Average statistical power was .360 (New), .339 (Bonferroni), and .344 (Holm). In conclusion, a new single step method with improved statistical power was developed for multiple tests when the researcher knows approximately how many independent variables are related to the dependent variable.
机译:Bonferroni调整可确保执行多次测试时,I型错误的总体概率低于标称水平。但是,该方法导致的I类错误率大大低于标称水平。研究人员开发了改进的Bonferroni方法来提高统计能力。其中许多修改顺序地测试了观察到的p值。最常见的改进的Bonferroni方法是Holm方法,该方法使用alpha /(k-1 + i)从最小的值开始测试观察到的p值,并使用alpha来测试最大的观察到的p值。这项研究的目的是基于Bonferroni调整建立一种改进的用于多项测试的单步方法。本研究中使用的多项检验是回归系数检验。将该新方法与Bonferroni和Holm方法进行了比较,以评估统计功效,同时保持I型错误的可能性小于或等于标称水平。本研究中使用的数据是使用SAS 9.1进行模拟的。样本数据(n = 25、50、200)被模拟为具有正态分布,用于k = 3、4、5,...,20个回归系数的假设检验。 x和y之间的相关强度(.3,.5)和x之间的相关强度(.0,.1,.3)有所不同。 x和y之间的非零关系比例(P_NON)从0到最大值为0.75,并且取决于执行的测试次数。根据结果​​确定小于k的新分母。计算分母的新值的公式为k-(k -1)P_NON。新方法导致类型I的错误范围为.0242至.0579,而Bonferroni方法的范围为.0103至.0579,而Holm方法的范围为.0113至.0579。发生的最小统计功效是.00451(新)、. 00286(Bonferroni)和.00350(Holm)。平均统计功效为.360(新)、. 339(Bonferroni)和.344(Holm)。总而言之,当研究人员大约知道多少个独立变量与因变量相关时,便开发出了一种具有更高统计功效的新单步方法,该方法可用于多种测试。

著录项

  • 作者

    Roozeboom, Michelle A.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Northern Colorado.;

  • 授予单位 University of Northern Colorado.;
  • 学科 Statistics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 353 p.
  • 总页数 353
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 统计学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号