首页> 外文学位 >Integration des criteres de conception et de l'analyse de cycle de vie simplifiee pour l'ecoconception de produits a usage unique.
【24h】

Integration des criteres de conception et de l'analyse de cycle de vie simplifiee pour l'ecoconception de produits a usage unique.

机译:一次性产品生态设计的设计标准和简化的生命周期分析的集成。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Nowadays, several available environmental assessment methodologies allow the inclusion of life cycle aspects during the product development process. This practice is commonly called ecodesign. Among them, Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) plays an important role once it enables the evaluation of a product through its whole life, from cradle to gate, providing a comprehensive environmental profile. LCA is an methodological framework regulated by ISO standards which uses natural science based modeling, describing cause-effect relationships, to quantify the potential environmental impacts of a product.;The identification of hot spots can be a starting point to provide simple information to the product designer, considering they help to ascertain opportunities in the environmental point of view, without the need to follow a rigid ecodesign approach. Thereby, the product designer can remain creative, while having access to environmental information. Furthermore, the identification of hot spots avoids product design options that offer little environmental improvement because they do not target the key elements of the life cycle of the product.;Therefore, this research aims the identification of hot spots through several streamlined LCA approaches. In a context of single-use products improvement, it is important to take into account not only the environmental impacts but also the product design criteria which comply with users' expectations. This project will therefore emphasize the environmental hot spots in relationship with the product design criteria.;The research project objectives can be separated into two distinct ones. First, to consider the possibilities of simplifying LCA, thereby reducing the time and effort required to conduct a LCA study. And, second, to develop a matrix (called LCA-functional) to associate the LCA results with the design criteria, the so-called functionalities of the products.;However, other simplified approaches have been developed in order to reduce the time and effort associated with detailed LCA studies. These approaches, called simplified or streamlined LCA, may be qualitative or quantitative, depending on the required data for their implementation and the methods used to assess the environmental aspects or impacts. Such as detailed LCA, simplified LCA can be used to identify hot spots of a product. Under this project, the term hot spots designate the life cycle aspects or the elements of the product (e.g. product components) which significantly contribute to one of the environmental categories evaluated.;In this project, a LCA on a single-use consumer product was compared to three other streamlined LCA methods: I1) Environmentally Responsible Product Assessment (ERPA), I2) Typological Environmental Analysis (TEA), both qualitative methodologies based on environmental rules of thumb and expert judgment, and I3) Material, Energy, Chemicals and Others (MECO), which is based on inventory data. Despite the fact that TEA and ERPA methods are easier to be executed, their application revealed that the data and the environmental rules used are too generic, which can be problematic in the case of a consumer designed single-use products. Results also showed that for an equivalent time and effort invested for the MECO method, LCA is the most reliable option (up to the environmental impacts using indicator based on cause-effect chain) to identify product hot spots.;Then, a matrix-based approach was developed to implement the LCA results (i.e. the environmental profile) into the design criteria (i.e. the functional profile). Two LCA-functional matrices have been developed. The first one assesses environmental aspects and the second evaluates the product components. The results highlight the relationships between quantitative LCA results and qualitative information on product specifications. This leads to a more relevant identification of environmental and functional "hot spots". Both matrices were applied to the case of an absorbent single-use product to show the applicability of the approach as a tool for ecoredesign.
机译:如今,几种可用的环境评估方法允许在产品开发过程中包括生命周期方面。这种做法通常称为生态设计。其中,生命周期分析(LCA)一旦能够对产品从摇篮到大门的整个生命周期进行评估,并提供全面的环境概况,就将发挥重要作用。 LCA是受ISO标准规范的方法框架,该框架使用基于自然科学的模型来描述因果关系,以量化产品的潜在环境影响。;热点的识别可以作为向产品提供简单信息的起点设计师考虑到它们有助于确定环境方面的机会,而无需遵循严格的生态设计方法。因此,产品设计师可以在获得环境信息的同时保持创造力。此外,热点的识别避免了产品设计选项的改进,因为这些选项没有针对产品的生命周期的关键要素,因此对环境的改善不大。因此,本研究旨在通过几种简化的LCA方法识别热点。在一次性产品改进的背景下,重要的是不仅要考虑对环境的影响,而且还要考虑符合用户期望的产品设计标准。因此,该项目将强调与产品设计标准相关的环境热点。研究项目的目标可以分为两个不同的目标。首先,考虑简化LCA的可能性,从而减少进行LCA研究所需的时间和精力。其次,开发矩阵(称为LCA功能)以将LCA结果与设计标准(即产品的功能)相关联;但是,已经开发了其他简化方法以减少时间和精力与详细的LCA研究相关。这些方法称为简化或简化的LCA,可以定性或定量,具体取决于实施所需的数据以及用于评估环境或影响的方法。例如详细的LCA,简化的LCA可用于识别产品的热点。在该项目下,热点一词表示产品的生命周期方面或元素(例如,产品组件)对所评估的环境类别之一有重大贡献。;在该项目中,一次性消费品的生命周期评估是与其他三种简化的LCA方法进行了比较:I1)环境责任产品评估(ERPA),I2)类型学环境分析(TEA),这两种方法都是基于环境经验法则和专家判断的定性方法,以及I3)材料,能源,化学物质和其他(MECO),它基于库存数据。尽管TEA和ERPA方法更易于执行,但它们的应用表明,所使用的数据和环境规则过于笼统,在消费者设计的一次性产品的情况下可能会出现问题。结果还表明,在MECO方法投入的时间和精力上,LCA是确定产品热点的最可靠的选择(使用基于因果链的指标来达到对环境的影响);然后,基于矩阵开发了将LCA结果(即环境概况)实施到设计标准(即功能概况)中的方法。已经开发了两种LCA功能矩阵。第一个评估环境因素,第二个评估产品成分。结果强调了LCA定量结果与产品规格定性信息之间的关系。这导致对环境和功能“热点”的更相关的识别。两种基质都用于一次性吸收性产品,以显示该方法作为ecoredesign工具的适用性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fugere, Mylene.;

  • 作者单位

    Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Ecole Polytechnique, Montreal (Canada).;
  • 学科 Engineering Environmental.
  • 学位 M.Sc.A.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 157 p.
  • 总页数 157
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号