首页> 外文学位 >The maintenance, evolution, and impacts of inducible morphological defenses in Mytilus edulis: Responses to multiple and invasive predators.
【24h】

The maintenance, evolution, and impacts of inducible morphological defenses in Mytilus edulis: Responses to multiple and invasive predators.

机译:食性Mytilus edulis中可诱导形态防御的维持,演变和影响:对多种侵入性掠食者的反应。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The burgeoning field of phenotypic plasticity and inducible defenses has documented a wide variety of predator-induced defenses. I this dissertation I have explored induced defenses in the marine mussel Mytilus edulis as they are affected by (a) shared evolutionary history with invasive crab predators, (b) specificity of responses to multiple predators (singly and combined) with different foraging strategies, and (c) spatial and temporal variation in the expression of predator specific induced defenses in situ.; Mytilus from southern New England expressed induced shell thickening when exposed to waterborne cues from the crab Hemigrapsus , but "naive" northern mussel populations do not respond. Yet, both populations thicken their shells in response to a long-established crab, Carcinus. These results are consistent with the rapid evolution of an induced response to the recent invader Hemigrapsus.; Mytilus developed significantly heavier shells only in the presence of waterborne cues from Carcinus, thicker shells in response to Carcinus, the seastar Asterias, and the whelk Nucella, and heavier adductor muscles in response to cues from Nucella and Asterias. These induced defenses subsequently protected mussels from Carcinus, but only Asterias exposed mussel were defended from Asterias. However, mussels exposed to the combined cues from Asterias and Carcinus expressed neither inducible defense nor deterred foraging by the sea star or crab. Furthermore, Mytilus did not thicken shells in response to cues from the native crab Cancer irroratus or the combined cues from Carcinus and Cancer, yet mussels did increase adductor muscle in response to combined cues from Asterias and Cancer. Thus, multiple predator assemblages can disrupt predator specific induced defenses (resulting in risk enhancement for mussels), but these effects cannot be reliably predicted from the predator's functional grouping.; Finally, in field experiments, I found that mussels expressed predator specific responses to Carcinus in mid-intertidal cages (but not Asterias) and mussels in low intertidal cages increased adductor muscle only in response to Asterias, and only during a year with high tissue growth. Together these results suggest that inducible defenses can be influenced by shared evolutionary history with predators and the functional diversity of predator assemblages.
机译:表型可塑性和诱导防御的新兴领域已记录了各种由捕食者引起的防御。在本论文中,我研究了海贻贝贻贝的诱生防御机制,因为它们受到以下因素的影响:(a)与侵入性蟹类捕食者共有的进化史;(b)对具有多种觅食策略的(多种)捕食者的反应的特异性;以及(c)捕食者特异性原位防御的表达的时空变化;来自新英格兰南部的Mytilus暴露于来自螃蟹Hemigrapsus的水基线索时,会引起诱导的壳增厚,但“幼稚的”北部贻贝种群没有反应。然而,这两种种群都对长期存在的螃蟹Carcinus增壳了。这些结果与对近来侵袭者Hemigrapsus的诱导反应的迅速发展是一致的。 Mytilus仅在存在来自Carcinus的水基线索,响应于Carcinus,seastar Asterias和Whelk Nucella的贝壳较厚,以及响应来自Nucella和Asterias线索的较重内收肌时才出现明显较重的壳。这些诱因的防御措施随后保护了贻贝免受Carcinus侵害,但只有暴露于贻贝的Asterias才受到Asterias的防御。然而,贻贝暴露于来自Asterias和Carcinus的综合线索中,并没有表现出诱导性防御,也没有阻止海星或螃蟹觅食。此外,Mytilus并未响应来自天然蟹蟹irroratus的线索或来自Carcinus和Cancer的组合线索而使壳变厚,而贻贝却响应来自Asterias和Cancer的组合线索而增加了内收肌。因此,多种捕食者组合可能会破坏捕食者特有的防御能力(​​导致贻贝的风险增加),但是这些影响无法从捕食者的功能分组中可靠地预测。最后,在野外实验中,我发现贻贝在潮间中的网箱中表达捕食者对食肉类的特异性反应(但不是Asterias),潮间低网箱中的贻贝仅在对Asterias的反应中并且仅在组织生长旺盛的一年中才增加内收肌。 。这些结果加在一起表明,诱导性防御可能会受到与食肉动物共享的进化史以及食肉动物组合的功能多样性的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Freeman, Aaren Scott.;

  • 作者单位

    University of New Hampshire.;

  • 授予单位 University of New Hampshire.;
  • 学科 Biology Ecology.; Biology Zoology.; Agriculture Fisheries and Aquaculture.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 151 p.
  • 总页数 151
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 生态学(生物生态学);动物学;水产、渔业;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:39:00

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号