首页> 外文学位 >Saint Aelred of Rievaulx and Saint Thomas Aquinas on friendship: A comparison of monastic and scholastic theology.
【24h】

Saint Aelred of Rievaulx and Saint Thomas Aquinas on friendship: A comparison of monastic and scholastic theology.

机译:Rievaulx的Saint Aelred和Saint Thomas Aquinas关于友谊:修道院神学和学术神学的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation investigates the theological accounts of friendship offered by Aelred of Rievaulx and Thomas Aquinas, compares these accounts, and applies this localized comparison as an index of the relationship between monastic and scholastic theology in general.;Through close reading of the key texts in which the subject of friendship is treated, Aelred's Speculum caritatis and De spiritali amicitia and Thomas's Summa theologiae, the two authors are found to epitomize their different theological milieux, the monastic and the scholastic respectively. This judgment pertains as much to the content of the two accounts as it does to the form. Thus, not only each author's theological approach, but his distinctive understanding of friendship itself, prove to be profoundly congruent with their spiritual-theological matrix, whether twelfth-century monasticism on the one hand, or thirteenth-century scholasticism on the other.;In fact, a loose, tripartite analogy may be seen to obtain among friendship, reading and theology in the monastic milieu, while a parallel analogy is to be found, mutatis mutandis, in the scholastic realm. Taking due care to demonstrate this relationship according to the rigors of comparative textual analysis, the earnest effort is made at the same time not to minimize the heterogeneity of the texts and theological perspectives in question. Granting Jean Leclercq's wise dictum that the Church has but "one theology," we recognize as well the risk of misconstruing that theological unity as monolithic.;In short, monastic theology, like monastic friendship according to the exemplary account of Aelred of Rievaulx, is ideally a balanced activity of reason and will, profoundly Christ-centered, existentially grounded in both sensible and spiritual experience, and quintessentially expressed in the perfect union of will and ideas between the persons involved. Scholastic theology, on the other hand, seeks to elucidate as clearly as possible both nature and supernature and the relation between them, in the bright light of natural reason, yet simultaneously elevated by the brighter light of supernatural grace. In doing so, the enterprise strongly resembles Thomas's notion of friendship as the ideal relation between God and man.
机译:本文研究了里瓦乌克斯的艾尔瑞德和托马斯·阿奎那所提供的友谊的神学解释,比较了这些叙述,并将这种局部比较作为一般修道院和神学之间关系的指标。;通过仔细阅读其中的关键文献友谊的主题,艾尔雷德的“窥器”和“精神精神病”以及托马斯的“神学”被发现,这两位作者分别代表了他们不同的神学环境,修道院和学校。该判断与两个帐户的内容以及与表格的重要性一样重要。因此,不仅每个作者的神学方法,而且他对友善本身的独特理解,都与他们的精神神学矩阵极为一致,无论是一方面是十二世纪的修道院主义,还是另一方面的十三世纪的学术论。事实上,在修道院环境中,可以在友谊,阅读和神学之间找到一个松散的,三方的类比,而在比喻的学术领域中,可以比拟找到一个类似的类比。根据比较文本分析的严格性,应尽最大的努力来证明这种关系,同时要竭尽全力,不要使文本和有关神学观点的异质性最小化。授予让·勒克莱尔克(Jean Leclercq)明智的教义,即教会只具有“一种神学”,我们也认识到误解了神学统一性是整体的风险。理想情况下,理性和意志的平衡活动深深地以基督为中心,存在于理性和精神经验的基础上,并典型地表达了所涉人员之间意志和思想的完美结合。另一方面,学术神学试图在自然原因的明亮之光下,尽可能清晰地阐明自然与超自然以及二者之间的关系,同时又被超自然的恩典之光所提升。这样,企业就很像托马斯的友谊概念,即上帝与人之间的理想关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lefler, Nathan.;

  • 作者单位

    The Catholic University of America.;

  • 授予单位 The Catholic University of America.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Theology.;History Medieval.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 245 p.
  • 总页数 245
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号