声明
致谢
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
Chapter One INTRODUCTION
1.1 Research Background
1.2 Research Aims and Significance
1.3 Organization of the Thesis
Chapter Two LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Studies on Parliamentary Debate
2.1.1 Political Approach
2.1.2 Linguistic Approach
2.1.3 Educational Approach
2.2 Studies on Argumentation based on a Classification
2.2.1 Studies on the Model of Argumentation based on a Classification
2.2.2 Studies on Classification by Objective Features
2.2.3 Studies on Classification by Subjective Features
2.3 Summary
Chapter Three RESEARCH DESIGN
3.1 Theoretical Considerations
3.1.1 The Pragma-dialectical theory of Argumentation
3.1.2 An Ideal Model of Critical Discussion and Rules for Critical Discussions
3.1.3 The Analysis of Institutional Preconditions in the European Parliamentary Debates
3.1.4 Three Aspects of Strategic Maneuvering
3.1.5 Argumentation based on a Classification as a sub-type of Symptomatic Argumentation
3.2 Research Questions
3.3 Research Methods
3.3.1 Sub-types of Argumentation based on a Classification
3.3.2 Analyzing Argumentation based on a Classification in a Parliamentary Debate
3.3.3 Evaluating Argumentation based on a Classification in the European Parliamentary Debate
3.4 Data Collection
Chapter Four RESEARCH RESULTS AND DISSCUSION
4.1 Institutional Preconditions in the Debate of the plenary sittings of European Parliament
4.1.1 The Institutional Preconditions brought by the Genre of Political Debate
4.1.2 The Institutional Preconditions brought by the Backgrounds and Procedures of the Institution
4.1.3 Influences brought by the Institutional Preconditions
4.2 Four Types of Argumentation based on a Classification in the Debates
4.2.1 Argumentation based on a Classification of Physical or Biological Properties
4.2.2 Argumentation based on a Classification of Rules or Policies
4.2.3 Argumentation based on a Classification of Factual Behaviors or Measures
4.2.4 Argumentation based on a Classification of Social Impressions
4.3 Strategic Maneuvering by Argumentation based on a Classification in Making a Convincing Case
Chapter Five CONCLUSION
5.1 Major Findings of the Research
5.2 Implications
5.3 Limitations and Further Research
参考文献
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 作者在攻读硕士学位期间发表论文的目录
江苏大学;