首页> 外文会议>World Organization of Dredging Associations(WODA) World Dredging Congress; 20070527-0601; Lake Buena Vista,FL(US) >DEFINING AND ASSESSING BENTHIC RECOVERY FOLLOWING DREDGING AND DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL
【24h】

DEFINING AND ASSESSING BENTHIC RECOVERY FOLLOWING DREDGING AND DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL

机译:疏通和清理不良材料后定义和评估底栖恢复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Assessing the recovery of benthic habitats disturbed by dredging and dredged material disposal operations is an important and growing management issue throughout the world. Although many projects have been monitored and a substantial literature on the subject exists, few generalizations can be made about typical recovery rates because biological responses are influenced by numerous factors, including site-specific bathymetry, hydrodynamics, depth of deposited sediments, the spatial scale of the disturbance, sediment type, and the timing and frequency of the disturbance. Additionally, there is no accepted definition of what constitutes "recovery." In various studies, recovery has been defined as a return of benthic resources to a baseline (pre-impact) condition, a reference (neighboring unimpacted) condition and/or both. Infaunal macroinvertebrates are most commonly monitored to assess benthic recovery, usually by sampling the substrate, preserving organisms in formalin, and identifying and enumerating the organisms in the laboratory. Methods used to analyze these data vary and may influence study conclusions just as much as the aforementioned physical factors. Study results are generally presented through some combination of three methods of data analysis, i.e., univariate statistics (very common and used almost exclusively in early studies), multivariate statistics (increasingly common), and benthic indices. We review benthic recovery rates reported for approximately 50 dredging-related (disposal and dredging sites) projects and explore the relative influence of both physical and analytical factors in the determinations of recovery status. Although early impact assessments relied heavily upon univariate diversity indices that were derived from species level identifications of macroinvertebrates, it has become increasingly apparent that multivariate analyses of the same data sets provide more sensitive measures of ecological status.
机译:评估因疏and和疏material材料处理操作而受到干扰的底栖生境的恢复,是世界范围内一个重要且日益增长的管理问题。尽管已监测了许多项目,并且已有大量有关该主题的文献,但由于生物学响应受众多因素的影响,因此无法对典型的采收率进行概括,这些因素包括特定地点的测深法,流体动力学,沉积物深度,沉积物的空间尺度。扰动,沉积物类型以及扰动的时间和频率。此外,没有关于“恢复”的定义。在各种研究中,恢复被定义为底栖生物资源恢复到基线(撞击前)状况,参考(邻近未撞击)状况和/或两者。通常通过对底物进行采样,在福尔马林中保存生物以及在实验室中鉴定和枚举生物,来最常见地监测粪便中的无脊椎动物来评估底栖动物的恢复。与上述物理因素一样,用于分析这些数据的方法也可能不同,并且可能会影响研究结论。通常通过三种数据分析方法的组合来呈现研究结果,即单变量统计(非常普遍,并且几乎在早期研究中几乎完全使用),多变量统计(越来越普遍)和底栖生物指数。我们审查了大约50个疏dr相关(处置和疏sites地点)项目的底栖恢复率,并探讨了物理和分析因素对恢复状态确定的相对影响。尽管早期影响评估在很大程度上依赖于从无脊椎动物的物种水平识别中得出的单变量多样性指数,但越来越明显的是,对同一数据集的多变量分析提供了更为敏感的生态状况度量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号