首页> 外文会议>Workshop on computational modeling of people's opinions, personality, and emotions in social media >Predicting Brexit: Classifying Agreement is Better than Sentiment and Pollsters
【24h】

Predicting Brexit: Classifying Agreement is Better than Sentiment and Pollsters

机译:预测英国退欧:分类协议胜过情绪和民意测验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

On June 23rd 2016, UK held the referendum which ratified the exit from the EU. While most of the traditional pollsters failed to forecast the final vote, there were online systems that hit the result with high accuracy using opinion mining techniques and big data. Starting one month before, we collected and monitored millions of posts about the referendum from social media conversations, and exploited Natural Language Processing techniques to predict the referendum outcome. In this paper we discuss the methods used by traditional pollsters and compare it to the predictions based on different opinion mining techniques. We find that opinion mining based on agreement/disagreement classification works better than opinion mining based on polarity classification in the forecast of the referendum outcome.
机译:2016年6月23日,英国举行了公民投票,批准了从欧盟的退出。尽管大多数传统民意测验机构未能预测最终投票结果,但有些在线系统使用观点挖掘技术和大数据可以高精度地达到结果。从一个月前开始,我们从社交媒体对话中收集并监视了数以百万计的关于全民投票的帖子,并利用自然语言处理技术来预测全民投票的结果。在本文中,我们讨论了传统民意测验人员使用的方法,并将其与基于不同意见挖掘技术的预测进行比较。我们发现,在全民投票结果的预测中,基于共识/分歧分类的观点挖掘比基于极性分类的观点挖掘更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号