首页> 外文会议>Verified Software: Theories, Tools, Experiments >Some Interdisciplinary Observations about Getting the 'Right' Specification
【24h】

Some Interdisciplinary Observations about Getting the 'Right' Specification

机译:关于获得“正确”规范的一些跨学科观察

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

One can use formal approaches either post facto to try to show that a program has desirable properties or one can aim for verified by construction (VxC). The former approach tends to focus on specific properties such as avoiding the dereferencing of null pointers; the latter is more likely to address the question of whether the steps of design satisfy some overall specification. I not only prefer the latter but I have also argued that this is the main way to get formal methods to pay off: there is more mileage in getting a clean architecture than in trying to debug a bad design by retrofitting a proof.
机译:可以使用正式的方法,或者在事后尝试证明程序具有所需的属性,或者可以通过构造验证(VxC)。前一种方法倾向于集中于特定的属性,例如避免对空指针的取消引用。后者更有可能解决设计步骤是否满足某些总体规范的问题。我不仅更喜欢后者,而且我还争辩说,这是获得正式方法回报的主要方法:获得干净的体系结构比尝试通过翻新证明来调试不良设计要花费更多的时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号