首页> 外文会议>Transactions of the 17th international conference on structural mechanics in reactor technology (SMiRT 17) >Probabilistic and Deterministic Treatments for Multiple Flawsin Reactor Pressure Vessel Safety Analysis
【24h】

Probabilistic and Deterministic Treatments for Multiple Flawsin Reactor Pressure Vessel Safety Analysis

机译:多重缺陷反应堆压力容器安全性分析的概率和确定性处理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Either of two methods, probabilistic-based or deterministic-based analysis, can be used in estimation of thernconditional probability of flaw growth initiation and failure for reactor vessel having multiple flaws. The probabilisticbasedrnmethod forms the basis for probabilistic fracture mechanism (PFM) calculations, such as the recent pressurizedrnthermal shock (PTS) studies by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and the code FAVOR developed byrnthe Oak Ridge National Lab (ORNL). In this paper, a simplified comparison is performed to show that deterministicbasedrnmethod used in the PFM analysis of PTS yields the same crack initiation and vessel failure probabilities as thernprobabilistic-based method. This paper discusses these methods and shows that the final results of the two methods arernidentical. Also, it discusses that the underlying bases of the two methods are the same.
机译:基于概率的分析或基于确定性的分析中的两种方法均可用于估计具有多个缺陷的反应堆容器中缺陷增长引发和失效的条件概率。基于概率的方法构成了概率断裂机制(PFM)计算的基础,例如美国核监管委员会(NRC)最近进行的加压热冲击(PTS)研究以及橡树岭国家实验室(ORNL)开发的代码FAVOR。在本文中,进行了简化比较,以显示用于PTS的PFM分析中的基于确定性的方法与基于概率的方法产生相同的裂纹萌生和血管破裂概率。本文讨论了这些方法,并表明这两种方法的最终结果是相同的。此外,它还讨论了这两种方法的基础是相同的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号