首页> 外文会议>Thirty-Eighth Space Congress, Apr 30 - May 4, 2001, Cape Canaveral, Florida >Subsidization Fact of Life, Necessary Evil, or Appropriate Policy?
【24h】

Subsidization Fact of Life, Necessary Evil, or Appropriate Policy?

机译:生活,必要的邪恶或适当政策的补贴事实?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Based on the history of commercial space launch, we can summarize the forms of subsidization as follows: 1. Government-funded development, no cost to commercial user 2. Government-funded O&M of launch facilities, no cost to commercial users 3. Government support of the industrial base and economic order quantities 4. Government subsidization of production and launch 5. Commercial pays only added costs of use of government-owned facilities 6. Free or reduced cost support services 7. Use of surplus missiles at reduced cost to commercial firm 8. Cost sharing 9. Access to expertise The United States government has employed methods "1.", "3.", "4.", "5.", "8", and "9" in the past, and of late is tending to modifying these with an increasing use of method "8." Method 4 was a chief feature of the original Space Shuttle program, but now in the U.S. this method is limited largely to use of government-owned production facilities and factories. There has been some limited use of method "7." in the U.S., but not for commercial payloads; examples include the use of surplus Atlas E/F and Titan II missiles and use of Peacekeeper missile first stages for Orbital Sciences Taurus boosters. The French, ESA, Arianespas, consortium has used all of these except for method 6, and that probably only because they lacked the surplus missiles to use. ESA has increased interest in method 7, cost sharing, but only very cautiously. The Chinese appear to have used all of the methods except possibly methods "7." and "8." The Russians appear to have used all of the methods, and for the most part still are.
机译:根据商业空间发射的历史,我们可以将补贴的形式总结如下:1.政府资助的开发,对商业用户无成本2.政府资助的发射设施的运维,对商业用户无成本3.政府支持工业基础和经济订单数量4.政府对生产和发射的补贴5.商业只支付使用政府拥有设施的额外费用6.免费或成本降低的支持服务7.对商业公司使用成本降低的剩余导弹8.费用分摊9.获得专业知识的方法美国政府过去采用的方法是“ 1。”,“ 3。”,“ 4。”,“ 5。”,“ 8”和“ 9”,后来倾向于通过增加使用方法“ 8”来修改它们。方法4是原始航天飞机计划的主要特征,但现在在美国,这种方法在很大程度上限于使用政府拥有的生产设施和工厂。方法“ 7”的使用受到限制。在美国,但不适用于商业有效载荷;例子包括使用剩余的Atlas E / F和Titan II导弹,以及在“轨道科学”金牛座助推器上使用“维持和平”导弹第一阶段。法国,欧空局,阿里阿尼斯帕斯等财团使用了所有这些方法,但方法6除外,这可能仅是因为它们缺乏可供使用的多余导弹。 ESA对方法7(成本分担)的兴趣增加了,但只是非常谨慎。中国人似乎使用了所有方法,但可能使用的方法是“ 7”。和“ 8”。俄国人似乎已经使用了所有方法,而且在大多数情况下仍然如此。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号