首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2018 annual meeting >GET COMFORTABLE BEING UNCOMFORTABLE: VARIABILITY IN THE ASSESSMENT OF PERCEIVED COMFORT DURING CLOTHING AND INDIVIDUAL EQUIPMENT EVALUATIONS.
【24h】

GET COMFORTABLE BEING UNCOMFORTABLE: VARIABILITY IN THE ASSESSMENT OF PERCEIVED COMFORT DURING CLOTHING AND INDIVIDUAL EQUIPMENT EVALUATIONS.

机译:变得令人难以置信的舒适感:在服装和个人设备评估期间,可感知的舒适性评估存在差异。

获取原文

摘要

Assessing comfort of personal protective equipment (PPE) and clothing and individual equipment (CIE) is challenging due to the variety of factors that influence perceived comfort. Comfort constructs are not standardized across domain areas and are inconsistently used. This research looks at the use of four different scales of comfort during a helmet product assessment, finding inconsistencies in responsiveness across the construct types. As compared to a visual analog scale (VAS), a 7-pt Likert scale with negative responses on the left and positive on the right, can potentially skew responses in the negative manner. Similarly, when presented with a discomfort-only scale as compared to a comfort-discomfort continuum, responses appear to be skewed in the negative direction as well. In an effort to promote standardization and consistency of use, particularly in PPE and military CIE product evaluations, it is recommended that additional exploration and cross-validation of comfort scales in practice be undertaken.
机译:由于影响感知舒适度的因素众多,因此评估个人防护设备(PPE)和衣物以及个人设备(CIE)的舒适度具有挑战性。舒适结构在各个领域之间均未标准化,因此使用不一致。这项研究着眼于头盔产品评估中四种不同舒适度等级的使用,发现了不同构造类型的响应性不一致。与视觉模拟量表(VAS)相比,一个7磅的李克特量表在左侧带有负响应,在右侧带有正响应,因此可能以负面方式歪曲响应。类似地,当与仅舒适感连续体相比以仅舒适感量表显示时,响应似乎也朝负方向倾斜。为了促进使用的标准化和一致性,特别是在PPE和军事CIE产品评估中,建议在实践中进行舒适度量表的其他探索和交叉验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号