首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2018 annual meeting >Effects of Automated Versus Manual Record Keeping on Anesthesiologists’ Performance: a Simulation Study
【24h】

Effects of Automated Versus Manual Record Keeping on Anesthesiologists’ Performance: a Simulation Study

机译:自动记录与手动记录保存对麻醉医师性能的影响:一项模拟研究

获取原文

摘要

Anesthesia Information Management System (AIMS)allows automatic importing real-time vital signs fromphysiological monitors to replace anesthesiologists’ traditionalmanual record keeping. It has been increasingly implementedin operating theater to provide an automated anesthesia record.At least 84% of all residency programs are expected to adoptAIMS between 2018 and 2020 (Stol, Ehrenfeld, & Epstein,2014). Yet despite the increasing popularity of AIMS, only ahandful of studies have examined the impact of automatedrecord keeping on anesthesiologists’ performance (i.e.Vigilance, situation awareness (SA) and mental workload). Forexample, various studies had examined the effect of automatedrecord keeping on anesthesiologists’ vigilance but producedmixed results (Allard, Dzwonczyk, Yablok, Block, &McDonald, 1995; Kay and Neal, 1986; Loeb, 1995; Weinger,Herndon, & Gaba, 1997; Yablok,1990).
机译:麻醉信息管理系统(AIMS) 允许从中自动导入实时生命体征 生理监护仪取代麻醉师的传统 手动保存记录。它已被越来越多地实施 在手术室中提供自动麻醉记录。 预计至少有84%的居住计划会采用 2018年至2020年的AIMS(Stol,Ehrenfeld和Epstein, 2014)。尽管AIMS越来越受欢迎,但只有 少数研究检查了自动化的影响 记录麻醉医生的表现(即 警惕,态势感知(SA)和精神工作量。为了 例如,各种研究都检查了自动化的效果 保持麻醉医生保持警惕的记录,但产生了 混合结果(Allard,Dzwonczyk,Yablok,Block和 麦当劳(McDonald),1995年;凯和尼尔(1986);勒布(Loeb),1995年;温格 Herndon和Gaba,1997年; Yablok,1990)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号