【24h】

Harmonization of Macrotexture Measuring Devices

机译:宏观纹理测量设备的协调

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper compares pavement macrotexture measurements obtained using the volumetric method and three laser-based devices. The study used data from a controlled experiment conducted at the Virginia Smart Road, as well as samples of in-service highway and airport surfaces. The data collected at the Virginia Smart Road, a controlled-access two-lane road that includes various hot mix asphalt (HMA) and concrete surfaces, were used for the main analysis. The other two sets of data were used for verification and validation of the model developed. The analysis of the data collected at the Virginia Smart Road showed that the Circular Texture Meter (CTMeter) mean profile depth (MPD) had the highest correlation with the volumetric (Sand Patch) mean texture depth (MTD) Models for converting the laser-based texture measurements to an estimated MTD were developed. The developed model was tested using measurements collected on several other highway and airport surfaces and with positive results.
机译:本文比较了使用体积法和三种基于激光的设备获得的路面宏观纹理测量结果。该研究使用了在弗吉尼亚智能路进行的受控实验的数据,以及在役高速公路和机场表面的样本。主要分析使用了弗吉尼亚智能路(一条可控制的两车道道路,其中包括各种热拌沥青(HMA)和混凝土表面)收集的数据。其他两组数据用于验证和验证开发的模型。对在Virginia Smart Road收集的数据进行的分析表明,圆形纹理仪(CTMeter)的平均轮廓深度(MPD)与体积(Sand Patch)的平均纹理深度(MTD)模型具有最高的相关性。开发了针对估计的MTD的纹理测量。使用在其他几个高速公路和机场表面上收集的测量值对开发的模型进行了测试,并获得了积极的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号