首页> 外文会议>Stormwater Symposium Proceedings 2012 >Everyone Wins: A Stormwater Retrofit in a Public Park
【24h】

Everyone Wins: A Stormwater Retrofit in a Public Park

机译:人人都有胜:公共公园的雨水改造

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As many other communities, the City of Rockville, Maryland struggles to add stormwaterrnmanagement (SWM) to older neighborhoods. Pollutant and erosion reduction goals vie withrnresident demands for recreation, mature trees, and open space. It is hard to convince residentsrnthat a SWM pond also can be an attractive community feature. With the new College GardensrnPark SWM pond, the City has proven that big SWM can be beautiful. Further, it can be arncommunity-wide design experience that provides a little something for everyone.rnCollege Gardens Park was built in the 1960s as a neighborhood amenity. The 2.4-hectare (6-rnacre) public park incorporated an old, spring-fed farm pond, and added play areas, a gazebo andrnpaths. A storm drain traversed the park, unconnected to the farm pond. The storm drain’s 32-rnhectare (79-acre) drainage area of mixed residential and commercial areas was 63% impervious,rnwith hardly any SWM. Canada geese had colonized the farm pond, leading to goose droppingsrnthroughout the park and algae blooms in the pond. At the storm drain’s outfall downstream,rnuncontrolled runoff was eroding adjacent backyards.rnIn the 2001 Watts Branch Watershed Management Plan, the City recommended reconstructingrnthe College Gardens Park farm pond as a SWM wet pond. It would triple the size of the farmrnpond, intercepting the nearby storm drain and routing runoff from smaller storms (up to the 1-rnyear storm) through the pond. The pond expansion would take grassed play area and causernrelocation of several park features. Although some residents embraced the new pond and parkrnupgrades, others feared loss of trees and usable open space.rnThe City spent several years exploring alternatives with the community, such as widespread LowrnImpact Design SWM. A new College Gardens Task Force spent two more years on concepts andrndetailed engineering design for the pond and park. The task force included representatives fromrnthe civic associations, the elementary school, the Department of Public Works, the City Foresterrnand Parks Manager, the City Manager’s office, and the City’s civil engineer and landscapernarchitect consultants. The process involved more than 20 public meetings. The Task Forcernwrestled with priorities and design issues, a park user survey, community selection of parkrnfeatures (such as deck materials, bridge and fountain styles, and stone veneers for walls and pondrnstructures), and landscaping plan reviews from the local garden club. By 2006, the communityrnand the City concluded that the pond reconstruction was the most practical and cost-effectivernwatershed improvement, and that both a new SWM pond and improved park features could coexist.rnAfter seven years of sometimes intense debate, the residents enthusiastically endorsed buildingrnthe College Gardens Park and Pond. It is the most collaborative and long-term water resourcesrneffort undertaken by Rockville Department of Public Works, which managed the originalrnwatershed study, the project alternatives analysis, engineering design and eventual constructionrnfor the SWM work, stream restoration and park improvements.rnThe College Gardens Park and SWM Pond project achieved more than its goal of full waterrnquality and downstream channel erosion protection, based on the State’s 2000 stormwaterrnmanagement standards. The pond incorporated two viewing decks, interpretive signage, dam andrnretaining wall designs to maximize tree preservation around the pond, and nearly 300 trees andrnshrubs. 4,000 plants were added in and around the pond for a lush wetland bench surrounding thernpond’s edge. Park improvements included a new basketball court, park shelter, and portablernbathrooms. Park paths were resurfaced and made compliant with Americans with DisabilitiesrnAct grade requirements.rnThe City completed construction in early 2010, eleven years from the first concept’s debut. Thernproject has re-designed and renovated the park, created a functional SWM facility with extensivernaesthetic and interpretive features, and installed stream restoration below the park. Achievingrnmodern stormwater control here means substantially less pollution and erosion to therndownstream tributary of Watts Branch.rnAs important, the new park exceeded everyone’s expectations and the community is extremelyrnpleased with the results. The park displays stormwater management in action in a way thatrnnobody imagined prior to this project. Other neighborhoods are now asking for similar SWMrndesigns for their parks. The College Gardens Park SWM pond is the result of a truly cooperativerneffort between residents and the City of Rockville.rnCity staff gained many insights during the eleven year process, especially due to the teamrnapproach this project required. Lessons learned included:rn1. Try to incorporate something in the proposal to suit all the users, reviewers, or critics. Itrnmay not be much, but a small feature, an added safety measure, saving one tree, or evenrnanswering a particular question keeps people engaged.rn2. Look for ways to make design features as attractive as possible. Look for chances to addrncolors, textures, veneers or concrete tinting, pavers, or other landscape architecturernfeatures.rn3. Let the community choose. The City can offer several acceptable options, but let thernresidents pick a style, color, placement or priority.rn4. Bring the varied stakeholders, interests and experts to the thinking table. Then ask themrnto listen to each other, so they understand the basics about all the issues. rnThey shouldn’trnsit at the decision table until they spend a lot of time at the thinking table.rn5. The end result has to work for all the City departments that manage the park and pond.rnCity staff buy-in is as essential as resident buy-in.rn6. Make sure the original project goals will be met (in this case, effective SWM).rn7. Take the time to build the necessary community and staff supportrn8. A good project may take years to come to fruition.rn9. Good post-construction maintenance is as essential as good initial design.
机译:与许多其他社区一样,马里兰州罗克维尔市也在努力为较旧的社区增加雨水管理(SWM)。减少污染物和减少侵蚀的目标使居民对娱乐,成熟树木和开放空间的需求越来越高。很难说服居民SWM池塘也可以成为吸引人的社区特色。有了新的College GardensrnPark SWM池塘,纽约市证明了大型SWM可以很漂亮。此外,它可以是整个社区范围内的设计经验,为每个人提供一些帮助。College Gardens Park建于1960年代,是一个社区便利设施。这个占地2.4公顷(6公顷)的公园包括一个古老的,春季饲养的农场池塘,并增加了游乐区,凉亭和小径。雨水渠穿过公园,与农场池塘没有连接。雨水渠的32公顷(79英亩)排水面积是住宅区和商业区的混合区,渗透率为63%,几乎没有SWM。加拿大鹅在农场的池塘里定居,导致鹅粪在整个公园内滴落,池塘中的藻类大量繁殖。在雨水渠下游的排水口,不受控制的径流正在侵蚀着后院。在2001年瓦茨支流域管理计划中,纽约市建议将College Gardens Park的农场池塘重建为SWM湿池塘。它将使农场池塘的大小增加三倍,拦截附近的雨水渠,并从较小的雨水(直到1年的暴风雨)中的径流穿过池塘。池塘扩建将占用草地游乐区,并导致一些公园特征的重新安置。尽管有些居民接受了新的池塘和公园的升级改造,但另一些居民却担心树木丢失和可用的开放空间。纽约市花了数年时间与社区一起探索替代方案,例如广泛的LowrnImpact Design SWM。新成立的大学花园工作队在池塘和公园的概念和详细的工程设计上花了两年的时间。该工作组的成员包括民间团体,小学,公共工程部,城市森林人公园经理,城市经理办公室以及城市土木工程师和景观设计师的代表。该过程涉及20多个公开会议。特别工作组在优先事项和设计问题,公园使用者调查,社区对公园功能的选择(如甲板材料,桥梁和喷泉的样式以及墙壁和池塘结构的石材贴面)以及当地花园俱乐部对景观美化计划的审查中进行了角力。到2006年,社区和纽约市得出结论认为,池塘的重建是最实用,最具成本效益的分水岭改善措施,新的SWM池塘和改善的公园特征可以并存。经过七年有时甚至是激烈的辩论,居民们热情地支持修建学院。花园公园和池塘。这是罗克维尔公共工程部进行的最具协作性和长期性的水资源努力,管理着原始流域研究,项目替代分析,工程设计以及SWM工作,溪流修复和公园改善的最终建设。根据该州2000年的雨水管理标准,SWM池塘项目实现了超出其全面水质和下游河道侵蚀防护目标的目标。池塘包括两个观景台,解释性标牌,大坝和挡土墙设计,以最大程度地保护池塘周围的树木,还有近300棵树木和灌木。在池塘中和池塘周围增加了4,000种植物,围绕着池塘的边缘建立了茂密的湿地长凳。公园的改善包括新的篮球场,公园避难所和便携式浴室。公园小道经过重新铺砌,并符合《残疾人法案》等级要求。rn纽约市在第一个概念首次亮相十一年后于2010年初完成了建设。 Thernproject对公园进行了重新设计和翻新,创建了具有广泛的美学和解释功能的功能性SWM设施,并在公园下方安装了溪流修复系统。在这里实现现代雨水控制意味着对Watts Branch下游支流的污染和侵蚀将大大减少。重要的是,新公园超出了所有人的期望,社区对此结果感到非常满意。该公园以该项目之前没有人想象的方式展示雨水管理的实际效果。现在其他社区也要求为其公园提供类似的SWMrndesigns。 College Gardens Park SWM池塘是居民与罗克维尔市之间真正合作努力的结果。城市工作人员在十一年的过程中获得了许多见识,尤其是由于需要该项目的团队合作。获得的经验教训包括:rn1。尝试在提案中加入一些内容,以适合所有用户,审阅者或评论家。它可能不是很多,但是它是一个小功能,一个附加的安全措施,可以节省一棵树,甚至回答一个特定的问题都会使人们参与其中。寻找使设计功能尽可能有吸引力的方法。寻找增加颜色,纹理,饰面板或混凝土色调,摊铺机或其他景观的机会。让社区选择。纽约市可以提供几种可接受的选项,但让居民选择样式,颜色,位置或优先级。将各种各样的利益相关者,兴趣和专家带入思考桌。然后要求他们互相倾听,以便他们了解所有问题的基础知识。 rn他们不应该在决策表上停留,直到他们在思考表上花费大量时间。rn5。最终结果必须适用于管理公园和池塘的所有市政府部门。rn城市员工的购买与居民购买一样重要。rn6。确保达到原始项目目标(在这种情况下,有效的SWM)。花时间建立必要的社区和员工支持。一个好的项目可能要花费数年才能实现。良好的施工后维护与良好的初始设计同样重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号