首页> 外文会议>SEAOC 2008 convention proceedings >Application of the Next Generation Building Codes to the Seismic Retrofit of a Historic Building
【24h】

Application of the Next Generation Building Codes to the Seismic Retrofit of a Historic Building

机译:下一代建筑规范在历史建筑抗震改造中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A historic three-story building located in Old Sacramento was selected for seismic retrofit. The building, constructed in the 1880's, served as a packing and shipment center due to its proximity to the rail lines. This structure is the last remaining non-retrofitted unreinforced masonry (URM) building in this historic town. It consists of wood post and beam construction and URM walls. Preliminary investigations revealed several critical seismic deficiencies. These deficiencies ranged from soft story response to degraded timber posts, and from heavily cracked URM walls to an incomplete load path for resisting seismic forces. The building is scheduled for seismic rehabilitation to bring it into compliance with the code prior to allowing full occupancy. This provided the opportunity to apply the provisions of two code documents for its seismic retrofit. The 2007 edition of California Building Code (CBC) devotes two chapters to existing buildings. The provisions in the California Historic Building Code (CHBC) references the California Code for Building Conservation (CCBC), which utilizes evaluation and retrofit methodologies in effect prior to 2007. Alternate provisions are presented in the California Existing Building Code (CEBC). Both CHBC and CEBC propose to provide means for preservation and utilization of existing buildings; an enhanced level of safety is provided without having to meet the full design and detailing requirements listed in the current building codes, such as the CBC. Although similar in scope, the codes employ different methodologies for evaluation, rehabilitation, and occupancy change for existing buildings. For example, CHBC utilizes working stress design, whereas load factor design is used in CEBC. The force requirements for the CHBC are less restrictive because the intent is to allow for preservation of a greater number of historical structures. A case study between the two codes was conducted to determine the impacts of the new code for seismic rehabilitation of an existing historic URM structure. For clarity, the CHBC is used as reference when CCBC equations are used in this paper.
机译:位于萨克拉曼多老城的一幢历史悠久的三层楼建筑被选中进行抗震改造。该建筑建于1880年代,由于靠近铁路线,因此成为包装和运输中心。该结构是该历史名镇中最后剩下的未经翻新的非加固石工(URM)建筑。它由木桩和梁结构以及URM墙组成。初步调查发现了几个严重的地震缺陷。这些缺陷的范围从软故事响应到退化的木材柱子,从严重破裂的URM墙到不完整的载荷路径以抵抗地震力。该建筑物计划进行地震修复,以使其完全符合法规要求,然后才能完全占用。这为将两个规范文件的规定应用于地震翻新提供了机会。 2007年版的《加州建筑规范》(CBC)将现有建筑分为两章。加利福尼亚州历史建筑法规(CHBC)中的规定引用了加利福尼亚建筑保护法规(CCBC),该法规采用了2007年之前生效的评估和改造方法。加利福尼亚州现有建筑法规(CEBC)中提出了替代规定。 CHBC和CEBC均建议提供保存和利用现有建筑物的手段;无需满足当前建筑法规(例如CBC)中列出的完整设计和详细要求,就可以提高安全性。尽管范围相似,但这些法规采用了不同的方法来评估,修复和更改现有建筑物的占用率。例如,CHBC使用工作应力设计,而CEBC使用负载系数设计。 CHBC的兵力要求不那么严格,因为其目的是要保留更多的历史建筑。在这两个规范之间进行了案例研究,以确定新规范对现有历史URM结构进行地震修复的影响。为了清楚起见,当本文使用CCBC方程时,将CHBC用作参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号