首页> 外文会议>Safety is not an option >FAILURE MODES EFFECTS AND CRITICALITY ANALYSIS, AN UNDERUTILIZED SAFETY, RELIABILITY, PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING TOOL
【24h】

FAILURE MODES EFFECTS AND CRITICALITY ANALYSIS, AN UNDERUTILIZED SAFETY, RELIABILITY, PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING TOOL

机译:故障模式的影响和关键性分析,不充分的安全性,可靠性,项目管理和系统工程工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The majority of space programs whether manned orrnunmanned for science or exploration require that arnFailure Modes Effects and Criticality Analysisrn(FMECA) be performed as part of their safety andrnreliability activities. This comes as no surprise givenrnthat FMECAs have been an integral part of thernreliability engineer’s toolkit since the 1950s. Thernreasons for performing a FMECA are well knownrnincluding fleshing out system single point failures,rnsystem hazards and critical components and functions.rnHowever, in the author’s ten years’ experience as arnspace systems safety and reliability engineer, findingsrndemonstrate that the FMECA is often performed as anrnafterthought, simply to meet contract deliverablernrequirements and is often started long after the systemrnrequirements allocation and preliminary design havernbeen completed. There are also important qualitativernand quantitative components often missing which canrnprovide useful data to all of project stakeholders. Theserninclude; probability of occurrence, probability ofrndetection, time to effect and time to detect and, finally,rnthe Risk Priority Number.rnThis is unfortunate as the FMECA is a powerful systemrndesign tool that when used effectively, can helprnoptimize system function while minimizing the risk ofrnfailure. When performed as early as possible inrnconjunction with writing the top level systemrnrequirements, the FMECA can provide instant feedbackrnon the viability of the requirements while providing arnvaluable sanity check early in the design process. It canrnindicate which areas of the system will requirernredundancy and which areas are inherently the mostrnrisky from the onset. Based on historical and practicalrnexamples, it is this author’s contention that FMECAsrnare an immense source of important information for allrninvolved stakeholders in a given project and can providernseveral benefits including, efficient project managementrnwith respect to cost and schedule, system engineeringrnand requirements management, assembly integrationrnand test (AI&T) and operations if applied early,rnperformed to completion and updated along with systemrndesign.
机译:无论是为科学还是探索而有人值守或无人值守的大多数太空计划都要求将arnFailure Modes Effect and Criityity Analysisrn(FMECA)作为其安全性和可靠性活动的一部分进行。自1950年代以来,FMECA已成为可靠性工程师工具包不可或缺的一部分,这不足为奇。执行FMECA的原因众所周知,包括充实系统单点故障,系统危害以及关键组件和功能。然而,在作者作为arnspace系统安全和可靠性工程师的十年经验中,发现证明FMECA通常是事后才想到的,仅仅是为了满足合同的交付要求,并且通常在系统需求分配和初步设计完成之后很长时间才开始。也常常缺少重要的定性和定量组成部分,可以为所有项目涉众提供有用的数据。这些包括:发生的可能性,发现的概率,生效的时间和发现的时间,最后是风险优先级数字。这很不幸,因为FMECA是功能强大的系统设计工具,如果有效使用它,可以帮助优化系统功能,同时最大程度地降低失败的风险。在编写顶层系统要求的前提下尽早执行时,FMECA可以为即时反馈者提供要求的可行性,同时在设计过程的早期提供可评估的健全性检查。它可以指示系统中哪些区域需要冗余,哪些区域从一开始就固有地是最危险的。基于历史和实践的例子,作者的观点是,FMECA是给定项目中所有涉众的重要信息的巨大来源,并且可以提供许多好处,包括在成本和进度方面进行有效的项目管理,系统工程和需求管理,组装集成和测试( AI&T)和运营(如果能尽早应用),则要完成并与系统设计一起进行更新。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Safety is not an option》|2013年|1-5|共5页
  • 会议地点 Montreal(CA)
  • 作者

    Daniel Richard Mullin;

  • 作者单位

    Canadian Space Agency., 6767 route de l’Aéroport St. Hubert, Québec, Canada, J3Y 8Y9, danielrichard.mullin@asc-csa. Ph: 450-926-7719, Fax: 450-926-6653;

  • 会议组织
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号