首页> 外文会议>Rough sets and knowledge technology >Evidential Clustering or Rough Clustering: The Choice Is Yours
【24h】

Evidential Clustering or Rough Clustering: The Choice Is Yours

机译:证据聚类或粗糙聚类:由您选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A crisp cluster does not share an object with other clusters. But in real life situations for several applications such rigidity is not acceptable. Hence, Fuzzy and Rough variations of a popular K-means algorithm are proposed to obtain non-crisp clustering solutions. An Evidential c-means proposed by Masson and Denoeux [6] in the theoretical framework of belief functions uses Fuzzy c-means (FCM) to build upon basic belief assignments to determine cluster membership. On the other hand, Rough clustering uses the concept of lower and upper approximation to synthesize clusters. A variation of popular K-means algorithm namely Rough k-means (RKM) is proposed and experimented with various datasets. In this paper we analyzed both the algorithms using synthetic, real and standard datasets to determine similarities of these two clustering approaches and focused on the strengths of each approach.
机译:易碎群集不与其他群集共享对象。但是在现实生活中,对于几种应用来说,这种刚性是不可接受的。因此,提出了一种流行的K-means算法的模糊和粗糙变异,以获得非酥脆的聚类解。 Masson和Denoeux [6]在置信函数的理论框架中提出的证据c均值使用模糊c均值(FCM)建立在基本置信分配上以确定集群成员。另一方面,粗糙聚类使用上下近似的概念来合成聚类。提出了一种流行的K均值算法的变体,即粗糙k均值(RKM),并使用各种数据集进行了实验。在本文中,我们使用合成,实数和标准数据集对这两种算法进行了分析,以确定这两种聚类方法的相似性,并重点介绍了每种方法的优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号