首页> 外文会议>Risk analysis XI >IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF LOSS GIVEN DEFAULT (LGD) MODELS' RISK ON REGULATORY CAPITAL: A BAYESIAN APPROACH
【24h】

IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF LOSS GIVEN DEFAULT (LGD) MODELS' RISK ON REGULATORY CAPITAL: A BAYESIAN APPROACH

机译:损失给定违约(LGD)模型对监管资本的风险评估:贝叶斯方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

"The model is wrong!" so it is determined. All of the estimated output using the model becomes un-reliable immediately. And so is every other result calculated using the unreliable output. So what is the impact of the model being "wrong" in the later calculations? To address this question, this paper presents a Bayesian approach that provides a quantitative assessment for the impact on downstream results calculated using the unreliable estimates. Section 1 details the practical challenge in the financial industry and discusses why this is important. Section 2 starts the discussion with a description of the overall framework for this Bayesian approach, introducing and defining each individual component. Then Sections 3 and 4 carry on discussing the prior and likelihood distributions, respectively. Section 5 then obtains the target posterior distribution by applying the Bayesian posterior update using obtained prior and likelihood results. Then conditioning on value of the unreliable estimate already in place in the portfolio, the density distribution obtained can be used to update the output of the "wrong" model and assess the impact in further calculations. This approach bridges the practitioners' initial expectations with the model performance and provides an intuitive quantitative assessment for the impact in the follow-up calculations which are largely affected by the unreliable estimate. The presented approach is the first in literature to raise the concern of uncertain impact caused by "wrong" models and propose a solution. The pioneer demonstration using uncertainty in the loss given default (LGD) models as an example and assessing the impact on the then calculated regulatory capital provides a timely assessment tool for model risk management in the current banking industry. Note that the abuse of the word wrong in quotation marks is an exaggeration of the uncertainty involved, in practice, impact analysis could be requested at any level of uncertainty.
机译:“型号错误!”因此确定。使用该模型的所有估计输出将立即变得不可靠。使用不可靠的输出计算得出的所有其他结果也是如此。那么,在以后的计算中,该模型为“错误”有什么影响?为了解决这个问题,本文提出了一种贝叶斯方法,该方法可以定量评估使用不可靠估计值对下游结果的影响。第1节详细介绍了金融业面临的实际挑战,并讨论了为什么这很重要。第2节以描述这种贝叶斯方法的总体框架开始讨论,介绍并定义每个单独的组件。然后第3节和第4节分别讨论先验分布和似然分布。然后,第5节通过使用获得的先验和似然结果应用贝叶斯后验更新来获得目标后验分布。然后,以投资组合中已经存在的不可靠估计值为条件,获得的密度分布可用于更新“错误”模型的输出并评估进一步计算中的影响。这种方法将实践者的最初期望与模型性能联系起来,并为后续计算中的影响提供了直观的定量评估,这些影响在很大程度上受到不可靠的估计的影响。提出的方法是文献中第一个提出由“错误”模型引起的不确定影响的担忧并提出解决方案的方法。以违约给定损失(LGD)模型的不确定性为例并评估对当时计算出的监管资本的影响的先驱性演示为当前银行业的模型风险管理提供了及时的评估工具。请注意,滥用引号中的错误一词是对不确定性的夸大,实际上,可以在任何不确定性水平上进行影响分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号