首页> 外文会议>Risk Analysis VI: Simulation and Hazard Mitigation >Risk management in the aeronautical industry: results of an application of two methods
【24h】

Risk management in the aeronautical industry: results of an application of two methods

机译:航空业的风险管理:两种方法的应用结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This article presents the results of two risk management methods, applied in the aeronautical industry, during the development of an aircraft for the executive market. The first method is the risk management in accordance with the best practices of Project Management International (PMI), and the second is a proposal of risk management based on Multicriteria Fuzzy Analysis (MFA). The PMI method of risk management is already widely used by the market. Its terminology is quite similar to other international standards of risk management. The MFA risk management method is a new proposal that requires specialist opinions, through a questionnaire, to identify internal and external project risks, measuring their level of threat to the project success. The structure of the questionnaire follows Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS) methodology of the PMI. This new approach generates indicators at three levels: operational, tactical and strategic, which facilitates the monitoring and the management of risks. Despite its rncomplex mathematical base, the MFA method is easier to implement. Both methods reach a similar degree of risk indicators for the project; however, the MFA can be used in an earlier phase of the project, which can avoid some possible earlier risk entanglements. Due to the particularities of each method, both show important contributions to the project risk management. Therefore, complex projects should use both methods to achieve adequate risk management.
机译:本文介绍了在为执行市场开发飞机时在航空业中应用的两种风险管理方法的结果。第一种方法是根据国际项目管理(PMI)的最佳实践进行的风险管理,第二种方法是基于多准则模糊分析(MFA)的风险管理建议。 PMI风险管理方法已经被市场广泛使用。它的术语与其他国际风险管理标准非常相似。 MFA风险管理方法是一项新建议,需要专家通过问卷调查表来确定内部和外部项目风险,以衡量其对项目成功的威胁程度。问卷的结构遵循PMI的风险分解结构(RBS)方法。这种新方法在三个层面上产生指标:运营,战术和战略,这有助于风险的监控和管理。尽管具有复杂的数学基础,但MFA方法更易于实现。两种方法在项目中达到相似程度的风险指标;但是,MFA可以在项目的早期阶段使用,这可以避免某些可能的早期风险纠缠。由于每种方法的特殊性,它们都对项目风险管理做出了重要贡献。因此,复杂的项目应使用两种方法来实现适当的风险管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号