首页> 外文会议>Research, Invention, and Innovation Congress >Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)-based Criteria Analysis for 3D Printer Selection in Additive Manufacturing
【24h】

Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)-based Criteria Analysis for 3D Printer Selection in Additive Manufacturing

机译:基于模糊层次分析法的增材制造3D打印机选择标准分析

获取原文

摘要

Additive Manufacturing (AM) or 3 Dimensional Printing (3DP) has globally gained popularity from using digital technology in various applications. However, process planning for 3DP is challenged by different materials, technologies, and printer sizes, which impact efficient and effective use of 3DP. In this study, we evaluate the factors/criteria that are related to selecting the best alternative of 3D printers by analyzing two types of decision makers, which are 1) 3DP technical experts and 2) 3DP users. Next, we employ Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) to analyze criteria weights for 3D printer selection-related factors. In particular, factors concerning 3D printed product, 3D printer characteristics, and material properties are considered in this evaluation with a number of associated sub-factors. The initial results show that the most essential factor for both types of decision makers is product factor, followed by material, and printer, respectively. Group decision analysis shows relative weights to be 0.534 (53.4 %) for product factor, 0.301 (30.1 %) for material factor, and 0.175 (17.5%) for printer factor, respectively.
机译:通过在各种应用中使用数字技术,增材制造(AM)或3维打印(3DP)在全球范围内获得了普及。但是,用于3DP的过程计划受到不同材料,技术和打印机尺寸的挑战,这影响了3DP的有效使用。在这项研究中,我们通过分析两种类型的决策者,即1)3DP技术专家和2)3DP用户,来评估与选择3D打印机最佳替代品相关的因素/标准。接下来,我们采用模糊分析层次过程(Fuzzy AHP)来分析3D打印机选择相关因素的标准权重。特别是,在此评估中考虑了与3D打印产品,3D打印机特性和材料特性有关的因素以及许多相关的子因素。初步结果表明,对于这两种类型的决策者来说,最重要的因素是产品因素,其次是材料和打印机。小组决策分析显示,产品因子的相对权重分别为0.534(53.4%),材料因子的相对权重分别为0.301(30.1%)和打印机因子的相对权重分别为0.175(17.5%)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号