首页> 外文会议>Remote sensing for environmental monitoring, GIS applications, and geology VIII >Evaluation of adequacy of DEM level-1 as an alternative to level-2: in a context of a case study for radiometric normalization of desert bare soil in Saudi Arabia
【24h】

Evaluation of adequacy of DEM level-1 as an alternative to level-2: in a context of a case study for radiometric normalization of desert bare soil in Saudi Arabia

机译:评估DEM 1级替代2级的适当性:以沙特阿拉伯沙漠裸露土壤辐射归一化为例的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has not yet had a full (national) land cover mapping survey. The very limited areas in Saudi Arabia covered by the 30m resolution DEM level-2 that is compatible with the fine and medium resolution (SPOT and TM) imagery makes it unreliable as a topographic source. The validity of the lower spatial resolution (100m) DEM level-1 of full coverage of the Kingdom as a substitute is tested for that purpose. Two approaches to assessment were considered for this purpose. The first approach, implemented in this paper, involved a comparison between the two DEMs data with the aid of reference data, whereas in the second, not published yet, the assessment was performed on the radiometrically corrected image data using the two DEMs data. Visual and statistical analyses have revealed that differences (discrepancies) between the two DEMs increase with increase of terrain slope, indicating that possibility of DEM level-1 to replace level-2 decreases with increase in terrain slope. The possibility of DEM level-1 to be an adequate alternative to level-2 would apply in flat to moderate terrain (0°- 5°) only, and is expected to decrease as terrain orientation turns away from north (highest differences at 271°- 360°). The differences between the two DEMs for west facing slopes (i.e., 181°-360°) are significantly higher than those for east oriented slopes (i.e., 0° - 180°).
机译:沙特阿拉伯王国尚未进行完整的(全国性)土地覆盖图调查。沙特阿拉伯非常有限的区域被30m分辨率DEM级别2所覆盖,该区域与精细和中分辨率(SPOT和TM)图像兼容,因此它作为地形来源不可靠。为此目的,测试了王国的较低覆盖范围的较低空间分辨率(100m)DEM级别1的有效性。为此考虑了两种评估方法。本文采用的第一种方法是在两个DEM数据之间借助参考数据进行比较,而在第二种方法(尚未发布)中,使用两个DEM数据对经过放射线校正的图像数据进行评估。视觉和统计分析表明,两个DEM之间的差异(差异)随地形坡度的增加而增加,这表明DEM级别1取代级别2的可能性随地形坡度的增加而减小。 DEM级别1替代级别2的可能性仅适用于平坦到中等的地形(0°-5°),并且随着地形方向偏离北方而预计会降低(最大差异为271°) -360°)。面向西的坡度(即181°-360°)的两个DEM之间的差异明显大于面向东的坡度(即0°-180°)的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号